My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
01-17-2001 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 2:31:49 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 2:22:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday. November 20,2000 <br />(W2640/264I ORONO AMHAR, Continued) <br />Gaffron noted a work session is Kheduled with the City Council for December 7* to discuss <br />this item. Gaflron stated a work session is also needed in order to discuss the proposed <br />ordinance. Gaffron staled if this application is tabled, the Planning Commission w ill not see it <br />n|.!.in until January. Gaffron suggested lliat a formal meeting could be held in December to <br />discuss this project. <br />Nygard suggested meeting sometime after the City Council mceiiiig <br />Mayor Jabbour suggested tliat perhaps a joint meeting with the Planning Commission be held on <br />December 7* Jabbour staled the City needs to look at pro\ iding higher density housing <br />llawn inquired whether tliis matter could be sent on to the City Council without a <br />recommendation <br />Gaffron stated the City Council will probably send it back for review by the Planning <br />Commission at some point. Gaffron stated the Plannii^ Commission could give conceptual <br />approval to this plan. <br />Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to give conceptual approval to Application <br />M2640/264I, P.U.DJSubdivision/Reroning/Ccmmcrcial Site Plan, and to send this <br />application forward to the City Council for their comment. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />I lawn noted there is not a consensus on the appropriate density. <br />Dunbar indicated he is not opposed to cMciiding the 60 day time limit. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CO.MMENTS <br />(«I2) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING <br />COUNCIL MEETINGS OCTOBER 23,2000 AND NOVEMBER 13,2000 <br />This item was not discussed <br />(N14) PLANNING CO.M.MISSION MEETING FOR OCTOBER 16.2000 <br />Berg moved, Nygard seconded, to approve the minutes of the Regular Planning <br />Commission meeting of October 16,2000, as submitted. \’OTE: Ayes 6. Nays 0. <br />Nygard moved, Lindquist, to approve the minutes of the Regular Planning <br />Commiuion meeting of September 25,2000, as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />PAGE 29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.