My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
11-18-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:12:34 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:11:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 21,2002 <br />6:30 o*clock p.m. <br />indicated that she was struggling to see how this could be a problem to «he neighbors when it <br />would be nfostly blocked anyway. <br />Chair Smith complimented the applicant on his willingness to cooperate with the neighbors and <br />stated that, in reality, he could even remove the large row of pine trees on his property if he <br />chose to. She indicated that instead he is proposing to improve his property. <br />Rahn stated that, short of the berm issue, the applicant could plant rows of trees along and <br />aroimd the curve without the City’s permission. <br />Godfrey questioned whether he could continue to come back to the City to request additional fill. <br />Gaffron stated that the City code does not talk about a maximum per year, but a limit, which <br />could be even further defined in the motion. <br />Wiens stated that he wished to do the project right and invited everyone to come take a look at <br />his work. <br />Chair Smith suggested the applicant consider either tabling his application in order to work with <br />the neighbors, or moving it forward as the application exists currently. <br />Wiens stated that he preferred to move forward sooner than later and asked for further <br />discussion. <br />Mabusth asked how many cubic yards of fill the Commission was being asked to approve at.this <br />time. <br />Wiens stated that application is for 1500-2000 cubic yards of fill. <br />Gaffron pointed out that 700 cubic yards of fill would provide a 4 ’ high berm. <br />Page 7 of 42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.