My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:15:12 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:10:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Application Summary: The applicant has requested variances to side yard setback, hardcover in <br />75-250’ setback zone, average lakeshore setback and lot coverage by structures to replace a deck and <br />construct a three season porch to the lakeside of the existing residence. <br />The applicint has removed the existing deck due to safely concerns. It had rotted and people <br />were beginning to fall thru it. The proposed deck is slightly larger than what existed. The <br />proposed deck is 20’ X 30’ X 17 ’ (571 s.f.). The deck that was removed was 19’ X 30’ X 15’ <br />(512 s.f.). <br />Discussion: <br />The existing residence was built in 1976. At that lime a variance for lot area was granted. There <br />have not been any additions just upgrades to the existing residence. A new roof has been put on <br />the residence and the patio doors on the lake side were installed in 1999. <br />Because the applicant has removed the deck and the permit on file did not specify the dimensions <br />of the deck, the applicant has provided an air photo from the Spring of 1990 and submitted a <br />hand drawn measurement of the deck that existed. Also, when visiting the property you can see <br />the old footings. The photo shows the deck that was removed existed on the property for <br />approximately 25 years. <br />Side Yard Setback: <br />The deck that was removed was in alignment with the east side of the residence. The proposed <br />deck will continue in a straight line with the east side of the residence. The deck is proposed to <br />be 7.5 from the side property line. The subject property is required to meet a 10’ side setback. <br />The hardship, if one exists, is purely aesthetic. <br />Average Lakeshore Setback: <br />The deck including the railing is 6’ in height and is considered structure. The proposed deck <br />encroaches 19 into the average lakeshore setback. The proposal also includes a three season <br />porch to be constructed on top of the deck on the northeast section. This porch wall be more of a <br />potential view encroachment than the former deck. <br />Hardcover: <br />The hardcover in the 75-250’ setback zone is more than the allowed 25%. The applicant is <br />proposing to remove a substantial amount of driveway to lower what exists on the property. <br />The property currently does not have a deck, therefore the deck is not included in the existing <br />hardcover numbers. When the removed deck is calculated into that, the amount of hardcover <br />drops from approximately 4,089 s.f (43%) to the proposed 3,419 s.f (36%). <br /><<02-2823 Ronald Cloud <br />3460 North Shore Drive <br />9/3/2002 <br />Page 2 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.