My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:15:12 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:10:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dahlstrom Development LLC #02-2789/02*2840 <br />*Stonebay* Final Development Plan Review <br />October 18,2002 <br />Page 8 <br />To-this end, applicants have formally requested that the preliminary plat for the entire <br />development be approved, with final platting of the various phases to occur at the time of <br />their development. The initia) overall Hnal plat would plat each Phase as a separate Outlot <br />with the final platting of Pha^w A-D withheld until they are ready to be developed To effect’ <br />this scenano. applicants request that the Effective Period of Preliminary Plat Approval be <br />extended for up to five years. This is generally allowable under Orono Subdivision Code <br />section 11.10, Subd. 15. <br />^e benefits for the applicant are at least two-fold. First, no changes the City makes to the <br />Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code could impact the development ’s approval during the <br />effective penod of preliminary plat approval. Second, the properties would presumably <br />actuanyVlaUed^^^**^ ^ outlets and open land rather than as building sites, until they are <br />tolQpment Fees; Effects of Phasing. Applicants have also formally requested that <br />tn nf a^^l't'on to the approximately S22.000 the applicant has paid <br />o the Ciy to date in application fees, certain development fees are required to be paid at the <br />ti^me of development. These include Park Dedication Fees, Sewer and Water Connection <br />Charges wd Storm Water and Drainage Trunk Fees. Staff has calculated an estimate of the <br />expected development fees to be charged for this project, summarized as follows: <br />Development Fees Summary <br />Residential: Park Dedication Fee................................ § 545,000 <br />Sanitary Sewer Coruiection Charge........... 221,046 <br />Municipal Water Connection Charge........ 365,432 <br />Storm Water & Drainage Trunk Fee......... 235.600 <br />Residential Total $ 1,368,078 <br />Commercial: Park Dedication Fee.............................. S 137 400 <br />Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge........ 52,66S <br />Municipal Water Connection Charge....... 87,070 <br />Storm Water & Drainage Trunk Fee......... 5 4 152 <br />Commercial Total S 341,290 <br />A detailed analysis of the fee calculation methods was attached in the work session exhibits <br />Md IS available for review. The rationale for applicants phasing request is that the City does <br />of the development that generates those fees until the actual <br />e elopment occurs. The City has not committed to phasing of the development fees as of <br />IS \\n mg; however, this is a matter for Council discussion. Note that while the park <br />tn,nTT^ calculated on a unit basis, the sewer & water charges and the stormwater <br />the fee phasing <br />request, the fees would be prorated based on number ofunits or number of acres within each
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.