My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:15:12 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:10:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
allows the limited, primarily non-retail uses consistent with how this area is guided in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Because cezoning of the adjacent parcel was not the subject of the initial public hearings for this <br />project, staff h^ scheduled and noticed for a separate hearing on the rezoning. The applicants must <br />provide the City with a copy of their purchase agreement for the adjacent site and confirm <br />whether the current owners have any objection to the rezoning. <br />Staff would note that mere rezoning to B-6 will not guarantee the site is developed via the PUD <br />process; note that the PUD process was required for the comer lot because the City owns it and made <br />that a requirement of the sale, but we don ’t have that control over the adjacent parcel. Because <br />applicants have incorporated a portion ofthe adjacent parcel into their site planning, the City will <br />include language in the final development plan approval that requires future development of the <br />adjacent parcel must be via the PUD process. <br />Planniog Commission Action Requested <br />^^pi«^^ requested to make a recommendation to Council regarding the following <br />1. Rezoning of 2745 Kelley Parkway (adjacent parcel) to B-6 Highway Commercial District. <br />2. Approval of site layout. <br />3. Approval of architectural design. <br />4. Approval of lighting and signage plans. <br />5. Approval of landscaping plan. <br />Planning Commission should review each of the above-mentioned plans and determine whether any <br />revisions are necessary. A recommendation for approval should include the following conditions; <br />a) Final approval by Council should not be granted until the following issues are resolved: <br />1) Wetland existence and mitigation if necessary. <br />2) Stormwater plan satisfactory to City Engineer and MCWD. <br />3) Purchase Agreement to be finalized. <br />b) Approval shall be subject to a Development Agreement to be drafted by the City, such <br />agreement to incorporate conditions of development approval as outlined in the Concept Plan <br />Approval resolution, also including conditions for future development of the adjacent parcel. <br />V02-2842/3S43 Profctslonal Propertin of Qrono <br />October 14,2002 <br />Pa|e6of7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.