My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
10-21-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2023 12:15:12 PM
Creation date
2/22/2023 12:10:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
« * <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19,2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />While the Applicant, Ronald Cloud, was absent, Doug Schmidt of Hastings Conservatories was <br />present. <br />Bottenberg explained that the applicant had requested variances to side yard setback, hardcover <br />in 75-250’ setback zone, average lakeshore setback, and lot coverage by structures to replace a <br />deck and construct a three-season porch to the lakeside of the existing residence. <br />Bottenberg pointed out that the applicant had removed the existing deck due to safety concerns <br />and the proposed deck was slightly larger than what existed. The proposed deck is <br />20’X30’X17’, (571 s.f.) while the deck that was removed was 19’X30’X15’ (512 s.f.). Since the <br />original deck was removed and the permit on file does not specify its dimensions, the applicant <br />had provided the City with an aerial photo and hand drawn measurements. <br />The deck including the railing is 6’ in height and is considered structure and encroaches 19’ into <br />the average lakeshore setback. Bottenberg noted that the hardcover in the 75-250’ setback zone <br />is more than the allowed 25%, in fact, without the deck, the hardcover is 36%, down from 43%. <br />She continued that the shed located by the lakeshore is non conforming and staff had attempted <br />PAGE 26 of 26 “■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.