Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD DECEMBER 18, 1972 Page 2 <br />2. That ^ecomI^endation to be construed only <br />for a temporary structure for agriculture <br />and not a commercial enterprise. <br />Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />(Continued) <br />Q <br />Hennepin County Park Reserve - Division <br />Members studied the plat as proposed and <br />determined that the zoning requirements of <br />the R-IC zone were not met. They instructed <br />the secretary to ask the attorney's oninion <br />on the following: <br />1. What was the intent of Mrs. Hoppe <br />pertaining to ownership? <br />2. Who obtains possession of the property <br />when the owner dies? <br />3. What is the intent pertaining to taxes? <br />Does the owner or Hennepin County pay the <br />taxes? Would there be a way to pay taxes <br />by keeping the property intact without a <br />division? <br />4. Is the property deeded to Mr. Ford or <br />Hennepin County only for Mr. Ford's use? <br />The matter stands tabled until the Attorney's <br />opinion is obtained. <br />In the absence of a spokesman, a letter from <br />Mrs. Gilbert, explaining her position was <br />read. Members question Engineer Mills on <br />the reason a sewer assessment was placed on <br />this property when it did not meet the zoning <br />requirements of the R-IC zone and was informed <br />the principal reason was that it fronted on <br />two streets. Noting that there had been a <br />recent division of property in the area where <br />a public hearing was held at which people in <br />the area voiced an opinion that there sould <br />be no reduction in zoning requirements. <br />Elliott moved. Van Nest seconded, that approval <br />should not be recommended and both the footage <br />and unit assessment for sewer should be removed <br />from the two lots fronting North Shore Drive. <br />Furthermore, should there ever be a combination <br />with any adjacent property, the footage <br />assessment would have to be reassessed against <br />the subject property. Motion, Ayes (5) - <br />Nays (0). Gasch abstaining. <br />DIVISION <br />Noerenberg Property <br />2865 North Shore Drive <br />DIVISION <br />4735 Tonka View Lane