Laserfiche WebLink
o <br />MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING HELD OCTOBER 16, 1972 <br />in the event the present construction, <br />consisting only of footings, would be damaged <br />during the delay caused by obtaining the <br />necessary variance. <br />James Lassek, 2636 Lydiard Avenue, voiced <br />concern that the construction of the residence <br />at the elevation commenced, would give him <br />problems at his residence where the draii^^ge <br />problem was already critical. Elliott stated, <br />that living in the vicinity, she had become <br />aware that there always had been some problems <br />with a wet basement in this residence. Van <br />Nest stated he lived in the area and there had <br />always been some problem with ponding of water <br />on tne lot being built O/i. The Building <br />Inspector stated from his examination of the <br />lot after excavation for the basement, that <br />he could see where some water had ponded in the <br />northwest corner but he was of the opinion <br />most of Lot 4 had been lower than Lot 5 <br />but higher than Lot 3, hence the natural <br />drainage had been through these lots to the <br />culvert on Lydiard and the area just west of <br />the Fabric House. This was verified by <br />Elliott, owner of the Fabric House. The <br />following members verified they had seen the <br />subject property: Elliott, Van Nest, Poisson, <br />and Hays. Brad Hays said member Searles had <br />seen it with him. <br />Poisson moved, Ryerse seconded, to approve <br />the variance conditioned on the final <br />grading meeting the specifications from the <br />Village Engineer in his memo of October 11, <br />1972, with the Village Engineer making the <br />final inspection to see if these specifications <br />are met. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />Page 3 <br />VARIANCE <br />(Continued) <br />G <br />Donna ilartelle and Gladys Olson, representing <br />'!rs. Martelle, explained the reason for the <br />division was to give more lakeshore to the <br />easterly lot as the lakeshore was shallow <br />toward Tonkawa Road. The following members <br />said they had viewed the site: Poisson, <br />Gasch, Hays and Kullberg and could see nothing <br />adverse to allowi«ig the division. <br />Poisson moved, Kullberg seconded, to recommend <br />approval since the sites met all zoning require­ <br />ments and the residence being divided off had a <br />legal easement. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />Kullberg moved, Ryerse seconded, that the <br />meeting be adjourned at 8:45 P.M. Motion, <br />Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />DIVISION <br />1365 Tonkawa Road <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Mike Scheller, Secretary