10-16-1972 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

G O MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING HELD OCTOBER 16, 1972 Page 2 Van Nest questioned the need for a P.U.D. ordinance feeline our present P.R.D. ordinance was adequate, and expressed a fear that the adoption of a P.U.D. ordinance would simply open the way to a density increase. Mayor Oberhauser stated he did not feel this was the i^t*pose of the ordinance. It was merely to give more flexibility in planning, allowing large tracts to develop their own service and to give them more freedom in arrangement. It was decided to have more discussion on this at the next meeting. It was here decided to have another joint meeting of the Planning Commission and Village Council at 6:30 P.M. on November 5, 1972. The regular business meeting commenced at 7:40 P.M. Kullberg moved, Uyerse seconded, that the Minutes of the meeting of October 2, 1972, be approved. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). Messrs. Stanke, Sween, and Simmons represented tiie Eberhardt Construction Company in an application for a variance to construct a residence on Lot 4, Vern Mar Manor. It had been determined at the last meeting that the lot was 95* X 150* in a R-IC zone and was the last lot in this subdivision. It is serviced by and assessed for sewer and water. A building permit was issued to the Eberhardt Company by the staff during tne absence of the Building Inspector on the assurance by the company that everything had been checKed out. The Building Inspector placed a stop order on it until the matter of a variance for lot size and frontage was obtained; also, at the last meeting the matter was tabled for a legal opinion and an engineer*s report on the drainage in the area. P.U.D. COMMITTEE (Continued) MINUTES VARIANCE Lot 4, Vern Mar Manor Mr. Poisson read the engineer*s report written by Lyle Swanson of the Mills Engineering firm stating he thought there was a problem in the matter of drainage in the area before excavation began and that it could be resolved by a swale through the proposed driveway channeling the water to the rear of Lot 3, the adjacent lot, in the area wnere the natural drainage had gone previous to the commencement of construction. Poisson asked Mr. Cosby what the attorney had reported at the last Village Council meeting, rlr. Cosby said he had informallly stated that due to a permit being issued, the Village could be liable (Continued)I