Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 7, 1972 Pag© S <br />Herfurth aoved, Elli^'tt seconded, that after <br />listening to all the testimony he was of the <br />opinion the camp would cause no excessive <br />traffic, no decrease in property value, and <br />except for the two contiguous property <br />owners, noise would be no factor. He felt <br />the permit should be allowed for one year, <br />to be renewed thereafter and that a legal <br />interpretation of 34.023 be obtained from <br />the Village Attorney. Motion, Ayes (3) - <br />Nays (4). Gasch,Kullberg, Poisson, and <br />Searles Nay. <br />Councilman McCarthy suggested from the floor <br />that the Planning Commission members and <br />the Village Council and interested adjacent <br />property owners meet at the site next <br />Saturday morning to view the problems involved <br />and look at the mat.ar objectively, <br />Poisson moved, Searles seconded, that such <br />a meeting should be held Saturday, February 11, <br />1972 at 10:00 A. M. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0) <br />Charles Carl represented himself in a <br />variance on lot size and width on Lot 8, <br />Skarp 8 Lindquist, Fernhill. The lot in <br />question is SO* X 190* and the zoning <br />requirements are one acre and 140' width. <br />The half»section ma.j showine the d( <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />(Continued) <br />VARIANCE <br />The' half'section mat; showing the density <br />of the area was studied by members. <br />Discussion was now held on the suitter of <br />"single separate ownership", Searles <br />explained to members that this does not <br />refer to persons owning the property but <br />to the property itself--thus, if the property <br />had been standing alone and not been adjacent <br />to another property having the same ownership, <br />it would be in "single separate ownership". <br />Mr. Carl was asked that if one of the adjacent <br />empty lots were available at the same purchase <br />price as Lot 8, he would buy it. He said he <br />would not have the means to do so. <br />Ryerse moved, Elliott seconded, that if <br />Mr. Carl could prove the property was in <br />single separate ownership as required oy <br />Municipal Ordinance 31.200, approval <br />should be recommended. Motion, Ayes (6) - <br />Nays (1). Herfurth Nay. <br />Robert Birkeland represented himself in an <br />application to dredge a lagoon on his property <br />at North Shore Drive and Wildhurst Trail. He <br />stated the lagoon was presently abc.it 2' deep <br />and he wished to dredge out 41o cu. yds. to <br />keep the lagoon usable for his boat. Tlie <br />dredgings would be only used as a top dressing <br />over the clay fill placed on the premises at <br />(Continued) <br />CONDITIONAL USE <br />Robert Birkeland <br />Wildhurst Trail