Laserfiche WebLink
Application Summary: The applicant has requested variances to side yard setback, hardcover in <br />75-250 ’ setback zone, average lakeshore setback and lot coverage by structures to replace a deck and <br />construct a three season porch to the lakeside of the existing residence. <br />The applicant has removed the existing deck due to safety concerns. It had rotted and people <br />were beginning to fall thru it. The proposed deck is slightly larger than what existed. The <br />proposed deck is 20 ’ X 30 ’ X 17 ’ (571 s.f.). The deck that was removed was 19 ’ X 30 ’ X 15’ <br />(512 s.f.). <br />Discussion: <br />The existing residence was built in 1976. At that time a variance for lot area was granted. There <br />have not been any additions just upgrades to the existing residence. A new roof has been put on <br />the residence and the patio doors on the lake side were installed in 1999. <br />Because the applicant has removed the deck and the permit on file did not specify the dimensions <br />of the deck, the applicant has provided an air photo from the Spring of 1990 and submitted a <br />hand drawn measurement of the deck that existed. Also, when visiting the property you can see <br />the old footings. The photo shows the deck that was removed existed on the property for <br />approximately 25 years. <br />Side Yard Setback: <br />The deck that was removed was in alignment with the east side of the residence. The proposed <br />deck will continue in a straight line with the east side of the residence. The deck is proposed to <br />be 7.5 ’ from the side property line. The subject property is required to meet a 10 ’ side setback. <br />The hardship, if one exists, is purely aesthetic. <br />Average Lakeshore Setback: <br />The deck including the railing is 6’ in height and is considered structure. The proposed deck <br />encroaches 19 ’ into the average lakeshore setback. The proposal also includes a three season <br />porch to be constructed on top of the deck on the northeast section. This porch will be more of a <br />potential view encroachment than the former deck. <br />Hardcover: <br />The hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback zone is more than the allowed 25%. The applicant is <br />proposing to remove a substantial amount of driveway to lower what exists on the property. <br />The property currently does not have a deck, therefore the deck is not included in the existing <br />hardcover numbers. When the removed deck is calculated into that, the amount of hardcover <br />drops from approximately 4,089 s.f. (43%) to the proposed 3,419 s.f. (36%). <br />#02-2823 Ronald Cloud <br />3460 North Shore Drive <br />9/5/2002 <br />Page 2 of 4