Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />hardcover that existed before removals. <br />Rahn stated that he had no issue with the applicant moving further towards the street about 1 1/2' <br />which would still keep them within the average lakeshore setback. <br />Gaffron reiterated that the glass structure only could extend the additional 1 1/2’, the eaves on <br />top of that would mean that much more encroachment. <br />Rahn stated that the design could be revised so as not to encroach within the 50’ setback and <br />asked what would happen if the City goes beyond the DNR 50’ setback. <br />Gaf&on stated that City’s are allowed to go beyond the DNR recommendation, and have done so <br />in some instances. <br />Smith asked how vigilant the City has been to adhere to the 50’ DNR setback and uphold this <br />recommendation. <br />Gaffron noted that in certain situations they have granted the encroachment. <br />Rahn stated that he was okay with the 65’ s.f. “prow” addition and a 1 foot gable overhang, <br />which would keep the property well under the 1,500 s.f lot coverage allowed. <br />Gaf&on pointed out that the 1,500 s.f. is a limit not an allowance to be met. <br />Bremer stated that she had difficulty supporting this application since earlier that evening the <br />Melin application had been sent back to the drawing board when they had proposed encroaching <br />into the 75’ setback with a deck. She indicated that 50’ is much too close and she could not <br />support the application. <br />Mabusth stated that she had no problem with the west lot line realignment but had difficulty with <br />PAGE 18 <br />;