My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
09-16-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:27:19 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:24:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19,2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(U02-2S19 TIM DEVRIES, Continued) <br />Mabusth inteijectcd that the applicant really had no option of placing the structure on Lot 5 <br />because then he would have to legally combine the lots to get the credit for the principal <br />structure, and he would not want to do that. <br />Rahn stated that, in reality, he does have the option to do that but he chooses not to. Rahn asked <br />if the applicant was encroaching the buffer or not. <br />Gaffron maintained that he is not encroaching the City ’s 26’ wetland buffer based on the changes <br />he is going to make to the plan, therefore, there is no variance or hardship needed for this. <br />Mabusth asked if the City needed a mitigation area for the w’ork. <br />Gaffron reiterated that the City did not require it, but the Watershed does and what they ’ve <br />indicated they require is that the applicant merely protecting part of the area from any further <br />change. Preserving the mound area virtually forever. <br />Rahn asked for clarification if all that was before the Commission is moving dirt and fill for <br />grading. <br />Gaffron stated that because it is over 500 cubic yards being mo\ ed they needed to review it. <br />With regard to the CUP, Smith asked for clarification that soil from one area of the owner’s <br />property is being moved to another area. <br />Mr. Robin stated that if 300 cubic yards is 1 foot deep, three times that amount is being moved, <br />half will stay and half will move up to the northern property, with 120 cubic yards of the soft <br />bored soil likely removed entirely. <br />Gaffron noted that approximately 10-12 trucks will be leaving the site. <br />Smith asked, with regard to lighting, if the Commission could make a recomnicndation. <br />Gaffron stated that it would be bordciiine to attach any lighting recommendation to a grading <br />pennit. <br />Rahn stated that they will be required to meet the existing zoning codes and lighting is already in <br />the ordinance. <br />PAGE 25 of 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.