My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
09-16-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:27:19 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:24:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 19,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />(#02-2782 ORONO PROFESSIONAL PROPERTIES, Continued) <br />With regard to the topographic issue, Gaffron stated that if the trail is to run south of the power <br />poles, almost in the ditch, discussions will continue with Hennepin County about converting the <br />ditches along the Willow-OCB Rd. segment of Highway 12 into storm sewers, which would <br />provide an urban section and allow for a more attractive transition from Highway 12 to the <br />development along it. Gaffron noted that, while no specific plans arc in place, aAer speaking to <br />Hennepin County this past week this option could provide the City with an opportunity to <br />eliminate the ditch. <br />Gaffron indicated that staff found the Revised Concept Plan to contain a number of elements that <br />make it superior to the approved plan, primarily in terms of access to Kelley Parkway and site <br />circulation. He added that a resolution to amend Resolution No. 4828 will be presented to <br />Council on August 26, referencing the Revised Concept Plan and incorporating any necessary <br />revised conditions. <br />Smith inquired why the building size increased to 16,000 s.f versus the original 15,000 s.f. <br />Dr. Kotteman stated that the potential tenants for the professional building required that much <br />more square footage once everyone was able to put a pencil to the numbers. <br />Smith indicated that three issues were under consideration this evening, including, placement of <br />the lot line, topographical issues, and trail considerations. <br />Smith agreed that the revised plan was a much better proposal and could support moving the lot <br />line. <br />Mabusth stated that she agreed, especially, in light of the possibility of newly defined wetlands. <br />Hawn preferred the cleaner process of moving the lot line, as opposed to easements etc. She <br />asked if any unreasonable restraint would be put on the next door property by moving the lot <br />line. <br />Gaffron indicated that the size of the adjoining lot would be revised from 2 1/2 acres to 2 acres, <br />thus reasonable for development. <br />Hawn stated that she was uncomfortable with the awkward traffic pattern created by the Kelley <br />Parkway access and islands within the lot. <br />Gaffron indicated that staff had also struggled with this question, and came to the conclusion that <br />due to limited volume, generally no one should be stacked up waiting to get out. He indicated <br />that the proposed plan is a common parking scenario. <br />PAGE 3 of 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.