09-04-2002 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Tfisn\ Cfisne. wfirsizcup p^/e/cr S/^/o-z. et/^ „ . ^ CONSENT Permit Application No.: 02-2<t4 Applicant: _ _ Camp Teko . Tcmplr! T<r«^ Project: Camp Iniprovgm^i^^^_____ Location: _____645 Tonkawa Rnad. Omn^ Rule: B/D/F/N Jleccived: 07/24/02 Complete: 08/00/02 Notification: 08/12/02 Recommendation: ———————---------------------------------------------- Approval. Permit should not be issued until the following conditions ore met: I. Reimbursement of mailing costs 2 Payment of Rule J fees 3. Submit a declaration for the preservation o*‘ /etland buffers, filter strips and vegetated _____swales which must be executed and recorded Background: The applicant is proposing to construct improvements on an 18.4-acre lot at the address listed above in the City of Orono. The proposed project involves the construction of a 1400 square fom building addition, new paviilion. ADA accesses, expansion of gravel trails, and shoreline stabihzaUon. *^0 wetlands currently exist on site and will not be impacted by fillmg or excavation activities as a result of tWs project. Permits would allow for the construction of buildings, impervious surface, shoreline improvements and establishment of wetland buffersRuleB: Erosion control coitsisting of silt fence and inlet protection has beat provided throughout the Rule D: As stated above two Type 3 wetlands of less than one acre in size currently exist on site and will not be impacted from filling or excavation as a result of this project. The applicant has to declare two 16.5-foot buffers around the boundaries of delineated wetlands in accordance with Rule D. RuleF: ^e applicant has proposed to stabilize approximately 350 feet of shoreline with rip rap Cuwntly the shoreline is stabilized with vegetation, however, the appUcant cites erosion problems as a need to install rip rap to better armor the shoreline. Rip rap will be placed at a 3H:1 V slope and consist of Class III-TV rock which complies with MCWD Rule F fast-track criteria. Rule N; The applicant has proposed a total increase in impervious surface of 13,700 square feet with the proposed project. The proposed trails will be no greater than 10 feet in width with adjacent five- fool pervious buffers and therefore will not be subject to Rule N requirements. In accordance with Rule N. water quaUty, rate control and BMP requirements wiU be assessed in regards to the mercase m impervious. Runoff rate analysis shows that the proposed runoff from major rain events routed overland to swales and filler strips will not increase as a result of the project. Drainage will be routed through existing filter strips and created swales which are designed to perform water quality treatment through infiltration and retention. The swales and filter strips Will accommodate drainage from both existing and proposed impervious surface. Because these measures exceed MCWD requiremeals, staff has determined the ^plication to be in compliance