Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 20,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />(#02-2786 JOHN JONES, Continued) <br />Since this lot is only 3-4’ above the lake elevation, there cannot be a basement. The building height <br />variance is being requested to allow for additional living space. Weinberger pointed out that the entire <br />building does not exceed 30’ in overall height. <br />Weinberger continued that staff recommends denial of the application based on the variance requested for <br />building height. He stated that granting of a variance to height would be inconsistent with the intent of the <br />zoning ordinance, would set a precedent for other lots with similar characteristics by allowing a three <br />story house, and no hardship has been demonstrated to allow a third level in the house. <br />Weinberger added that staff would be willing to support a scenario of a building that would be <br />constructed within the site plan and not exceeding 2 1/2 stories based on six factors he identified in his <br />report. <br />Mr. Jones stated that he has made an effort to meet every setback requirement and is unclear what <br />constitutes a 2 1/2 story building. He asked for a clear definition of a 2 1/2 story building and how it has <br />bearing on his plans since he has met the 30’ height requirement. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Rahn felt the plan shows a three story home. <br />Mr. Jones maintained that the lower third level is mostly taken up by tuck under garage with one room. <br />He asked once again for definition of the half story. He believed that his plans could be designed around <br />this concept if he could be clear what encompassed the half story. <br />Rahn stated that his vision of a half story is the attic space of a home with knee walls allowing only <br />approximately half of the floor area of a second story. <br />Kluth reiterated that the Commission docs not have issue with the height itself, but the third story. <br />Mr. Jones asked for clarification in reference to the half story, questioning if what is allowed constitutes <br />50% of the floor area of a first or second floor. <br />Gaffron handed out a general definition, from the Illustrated Book of Development Definitions, which <br />defines the half story concept as floor area that is at least 40% of other floor level areas. He noted the <br />City has not formally adopted a definition of‘half story’. <br />Kluth stated a basement would not be considered a half story, however, an attic is considered a half story. <br />PAGES