My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:04:08 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IV. GENERAL SITE PLAN REVIEW <br />The following punchlist on various topics should provide Planning Commission with an outline of <br />the site plan elements that should be considered prior to making a recommendation to Council on <br />the Concept Plan. <br />1. Site Natural Features: <br />Existing topography of the site is indicated on Sheet C 1.1. The high point of the site <br />at elev. 1025 is at the far SW comer; the lowest point at elev. 1013 in the ditch just <br />north of the MnDOT ponds. <br />The site contains approximately 13.6 acres of wetland, of which 1.4 acres will be <br />filled or excavated per the revised plans. Wetland types being impacted have not <br />been disclosed as of this writing, since applicant has not provided the Wetland <br />Delineation Report requested in prior memos. <br />The full wetland delineation report must he submitted for review by staff and City <br />Engineer. <br />Staff would note that portions of certain City-protected wetlands on the site will <br />apparently be impacted: filling of portions of a wetland are required for Kelley <br />Parkway at its east end, a second is filled near the center of the property to create <br />building pads and driveways, and a third is slightly impacted by fill to create a <br />driveway for the four townhomes at the NE comer of the site. <br />All wetland impacts will be subject to WCA rules as administered by the MCWD on <br />the City ’s behalf. <br />Planning Commission should consider whether the proposed wetland impacts are <br />reasonable in the context ofthe proposed uses and mitigation (see Plan Sheet C3.2). <br />Plan Sheet C1.1 appears to indicate the extent of wooded areas and significant trees <br />(no key is given to define what types of individual trees were included). Should a tree <br />survey be required for areas to be disturbed? This is not a specific City requirement, <br />but is alluded to in Subdivision Code Section 11.60... the applicant should do <br />some degree of review of existing stands of trees to confirm the extent of woodlands <br />to be impacted and determine if any should be preser\ ed... <br />2. Stormwater Management <br />Applicants plan to expand the MnDOT stormw ater pond outside the MnDOT r.o.w. <br />to manage stormwater quality and quantity. <br />#02-2789(Rc\1sed) Dablstrom Developmeat LLC <br />July 12,2002 <br />Page 8 of 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.