Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed residence is a three bedroom, one story structure of approximately 2,100 s.f. <br />footprint. The property consists of three lots and a vacated street legally combined to form one <br />lot. The 20’ X 100’ portion of Brook Street was vacated by the City of Orono in 1984 per <br />resolution No. 1619. A condition of the vacation was that the property ouTier grant to the City a <br />Utilities Easement over the northerly 15’ of the vacated Brook Street for future use by the City. <br />In 1999, the property owner acquired the property north of the vacated Brook Street. The 15’ <br />utility easement was vacated by the City of Orono in 2000 per resolution No. 4545 and moved to <br />the south 15’ of the property enabling the property owner to redevelop the property. <br />The proposed residence meets City ordinance standards of 15% for structural lot coverage. The <br />property is allowed 3,410 4 s.f for structure, the proposed residence is 2,072 s.f <br />The property docs lie in the 500-1000’ setback area from Lake Minnetonka. The proposed <br />hardcover for the project is 4,756 s.f (20.9%). Tbe property is allowed 7,957.6 s.f (35%) <br />hardcover, therefore it is well below the allowed amount for hardcover. <br />Statement of Hardship: <br />The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit A. The applicant should also <br />be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. <br />Issues for Consideration: <br />1. The property owner acquired property to the north of Brook Street and the lot is extremely <br />undersize for the LR-1A zoning district, but similar in size to other developed lots in the <br />neighborhood. <br />2. The adjacent properties are developed, therefore there is not any additional land available to <br />meet the zoning requirements. <br />3. The existing residence on the property is in a non-conforming location too close to the front <br />lot line, and will be removed. <br />4. The proposed residence does meet City ordinance standards for structural lot coverage. <br />5. The proposed residence does meet City ordinance requirements for hardcover in the 500-1000 <br />setback zone. <br />6. The property is in a neighborhood where lot sizes range from approximately 0.15 acre to 0 45 <br />acre. If the % acre standards were applied to this application, all setbacks would be met. <br />7. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />002-2800 Marlys McCarty <br />225 Tonka Avenue <br />7/3.'2002 <br />Page 2