Laserfiche WebLink
3.Does the applicant's common ownership of the most affected property, located at 20 Orono <br />Orchard Road, eliminate some of the concerns regarding the impact this “horse farm” has on <br />adjacent lots. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Has applicant demonstrated that the environmental impact of a 3'** horse will be minimal? <br />If a conditional use permit is approved to allow one additional horse should there be some <br />sort of sunset provision if the number of horses is ever reduced to 2 or 3. <br />Other Recent Actions - regarding number of horses allowed on a property. <br />In September, 2001 Council approved allowing 19 horses on a 13.1 acre property located at 4100 <br />Watertown Road. The approval considered the property owners had established a rotating pasture <br />schedule that would be used for managing the site. The property owners of 4100 Watertown intend <br />to feed their horses separate from full pasture feeding. This property has a very large riding arena <br />and paddock area for exercising the horses. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the application to permit the three horses to be permitted on the <br />property per the request in the applicant's letter of application. One additional horse will not be <br />significant change to the character of the property and the applicants own the property that has the <br />most impact. The Planning Commission shall provide conditions that will ensure the impact of three <br />horses will not change how the property is used. <br />Planning Commission Options for Action <br />1. To approve. <br />2.To denv. <br />3. Table. <br />4.Other Action. <br />IV02-2797 Sandra Smith and James Murphy <br />30 Orono Orchard Road <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />i <br />t