My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:04:08 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July 15, 2002 <br />Jim Murphy and Sandy Smith request for additional horse <br />1. The current smell being generated by tlie raw sewage, wliich is not <br />being removed from property is almost unbearable in the summer. <br />2. The rainwater run off, washes the raw sewage from corral into the <br />nature wetlands on my property', a permanent silt fence should be <br />installed. <br />3. Downgrading of the neighborhood, which is made up of higher end <br />homes with neatly groomed yards. They have a horse corral the size <br />of a postage stamp with no grass and two horses. <br />4. Doesn ’t meet current set back requirements. <br />5. Doesn ’t meet lot acreage requirement for the number of horses. <br />6. Doesn ’t meet acreage requirement for pasture even for one horse. <br />7. Current pasture approximately 5,000 sq feet. One horse requires <br />87,120 sq feet. Two horses require 130,680 sq feet and Three horses <br />would require 174,240 sq feet. Today they fall short by 125,680 sq <br />feet <br />8. All residents should be held to the same standard no matter what their <br />position may be. <br />With all these requirements they are currently not meeting, I find it hard <br />to believe they have been allowed to have even ONE I lORSE on this <br />property’. Our neighborhood is one of finer homes, as is all of Orono. <br />These developments of smaller lots sizes weren'; intended for the raising <br />of livestock in this manner. Nobodv should have to live ne.xt to a <br />'lamyard. <br />I his request should not even be considered and I feel it is inappropriate <br />to continue to have any horse on this property. Current conditions should <br />be revaluatcd and all horses removed. <br />As a member of the same development, neighbor, and the President of <br />the Orono Oaks Homeow'ner Association, 1 request that their application <br />for an additional horse be REJECT <br />Thank you <br />John Dalbec 1565 Orono Oaks Drive, Long Lake, Mn. 55356 <br />Submitted to the Planning Commission On This Date. <br />Written Response Requested.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.