07-15-2002 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON JULY 14,1997 (#5 - #2248 David and Jodi Raho - Continued) Van Zomeren reported that the applicadoo was reviewed at the June 23 Council meeting for the variance and CUP to restore and btuld an addition to an existing residence located in the 0-75’ setback. A 5.3' side yard setback would require a variance from the 10* requirement. A lakeshore setback variance is required as well as a 0-75' hardcover variance for l9^/o hardcover, currently existing at 9%, where none is allowed. The CUP is required to alter land located in the 0-75' setback. The topography is such that the structure could partially be in the flood plain. Ji^ur noted that it b necessary to see the topography and elevation of the property. Vtfn Zomeren agreed that the main issue is the topography of the lot and low elevatioit Van Zomeren reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval as noted in the staff memo.• • Petmon, who along with Kelley was not present at the 6/23 meeting, asked Flint his opinion of the application. She indicated she had a understanding of the thoughts of Jabbour and Goettea Goetten said Flint's opinion b similar to her own. Jabbour noted that it had been determined that the application should receive a full Council decision. Peterson brought attention to the discussion regarding the flood plain mitigation. Goetten indicated that she felt the residence could be moved back on the property. Jabbour responded that a move would eliminate a sediment pond that helps the lake and be a burden to find a new location for good stormwater management for the property owner and Watershed District. Jabbour acknowledged the importance of the 0-75' setbuk but felt this was a good example of where an exception could be made. Rahn also indicated that the roof line allows for water directed away from the lake. He also noted that the poim was sandy and water ponds in the low lying area. Kelley was informed that the applicant b the current owner of the property. Rahn said he reviewed the ordinance and referenced Section 10.55 r^arding flood plain management. It encourages providing storage for runoff and elevating the building site. He said the code also allows for the average lakeshore setback. Peterson said the Council historically docs not approve structure in the 0-75' setback but noted the extenuating circumstances involved m thb application. Goetten said the lot b very small and substandard. She agreed that H would be expensive to move the residence out of the 0-75' setback, but said she has never voted for new hardcover in that setback. The applicant responded that the land is highest by the lake and then slopes downward.