My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:04:08 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MD^TES OF THE HEGUIAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 23,1997 <br />(^11 > #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) <br />Van Zomeren reported that the .3 acre property is located in the LR-IB Zoning District. <br />The proposal is to add structure to an existing cabin located rvithin the 0-75' setback. <br />The second story would require a variance to the side yard setback which exists and is <br />proposed at 5.3* and 10' is required. Lakeshore setback variance is required. Average <br />lakeshore setback is not an issue as the structure is located behind that line. A <br />conditional use pemit is required for land aheration in the 0-75* setback. Van Zomeren <br />reviewed the topography of the property. The 932' elevation line "wanders" on the <br />property. The existing structure is located at the high point of the property. 1 he flood <br />plain is located behind the structure requiring a CUP for any alteration. <br />The proposal is to square off the structure v/tiich encroaches the 0-75' setback. T ne <br />hardcover in that setback would increase fron: 9% to 19%. Van Zomeren indicated the <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the side setback and hardcover variances <br />noting that improvements are limited to an area behind the existing lakeside setback and <br />an additional ^f-stoiy. They also recommended approval of the CUP for land <br />alteration. <br />Goetten asked the applicant if he had considered moving the addition to the rear of the <br />structure in order to get out of the 0-75' setback. <br />Rahn said he met with the Watershed District. He said his design was an attempt to gain <br />a favorable response from the Council. He indicated that moving the structure back <br />would result in building in the 931.5' elevation which is the flood plain The plan as <br />presented would not require mitigation of the flood plain as the additions would be built <br />on posts. Rahn said the plan is an attempt to restore the existing structure. He thought <br />the Council would be less receptive to a plan involving alteration of the flood plain. <br />Goetten said her concern is with doubling the hardcover in the 0-75' setback with any <br />new construction if there are other alternatives to consider. <br />Rahn indicated that only one-third of the new hardcover is livable space, the remainder b <br />decking. He said he tried to keep the structure compact and only squared the structure <br />off The screen porch and decking b only 8' wide. <br />Goetten asked if Rahn discussed adding to the rear of the structure with the Watershed. <br />Rahn said he did. He met with Jtro Hafiier of the Watershed District. He said this <br />recommendation is possible but would occur in the lower area of the lot and require <br />major alteration of the flood plain. Rahn said the home is located similarly on the lot whh <br />other homes in the neighborhood and b the only ummproyed rite.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.