Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />meeting HELD ON JUNE 16,1997 <br />J <br />(HS - #2247 Wayne Holmes - Continued) <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to approve Application #2247 with the understanding <br />that the building cannot be closer than 10* to any property line or other structure, at a <br />maximum of 825 s.f, with retaining walls to be approved by the City Engineer, and plans <br />submitted to staff prior to construction. <br />The appUcant asked if a separate permit was required for the retaining walls. Gaf&on said <br />it would be part of the building permit approval. <br />Vote: Ayes 5. Nays 0. <br />(#9) #2248 - DAVID AND JODI RAHN, 1385 REST POINT ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:40-9:02 F.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Moling were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomere.n *-eported that the application is a proposal for construction of an addition to <br />an existing cabb to square off the residence and restore an existing deck and screen porch. <br />The .3 acre property is located b the one acre zonbg district. The structure is located b <br />the 0-75' setback. A hardcover variance is required to berease the hardcover firom 9% to <br />19%. Lot area and lakeshore setback variances are required A conditioi^ use pernut for <br />land alteration is required for any alteration or excavation b the flood plab and 0-75* <br />setback from the shorelbe. Van Zameren reviewed the topography of the property notbg <br />that the shorelbe contour is at the 924.9' elevation. The 930- contour foUows the <br />lakeshore; the 932' contour traverses the property, so the middle portion of the lot is <br />considered to be b the flood plab. The concern is where the 931.5 elevation is located. <br />The appUcant said he has Uved on Wildhurst Trail since 1975. He noted that the five other <br />homes west of this property is evenly setback as proposed for this residence. <br />There were no pubUc comments. <br />Stoddard bquired what the Watershed District’s comments were. Rahn said the <br />Watershed did not require any mitigation for the entry, deck, and screen porch as there are <br />on post footings. Stoddard suggested relocating the structure to lessen the variances <br />required. Rahn said his history as a contractor and buildbg official relates to his desire to <br />restore the cabb with the addition to square h off and has not conadered relocation, more <br />flood plab mitigation would be required, and its present location is the high spot on the <br />property. He would like to mabtab the character of the property. He noted that b order <br />to move the structure befabd the 75’ setback would requhe use of a holdbg area b that <br />setback. Stoddard noted that mitigation can occur elsewhere. <br />14