My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
07-15-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:04:08 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 4:00:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />3. <br />required lot area. The property consists of approximately .173 acres or 7,515 s.f. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 18, 2001 and <br />recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The property has been developed with a residential use since at least 1900. <br />B. The site plan indicates the proposed setbacks 10' to the side property lines <br />and the house would be outside of the 75’ lakeshore setback. The entire <br />house w’ould be located approximately 550' from the lakeshore, which meets <br />the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for new structures. <br />C. There is no additional land to combine with the property. <br />D. The hardcover in the 75-250’ zone will be 314 s.f. (42%) to allow for <br />additional driveway. The additional driveway will allow for off street <br />parking. The new residence will be located closer to the street than c.xisting <br />residence, minimizing driveway hardcover on the lot. <br />E. The existing 10' x 12' shed on the rear of the property will be removed. <br />5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br />it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br />the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br />or difficulty; is necessarv ’ to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; <br />and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />6. The City' Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Plaiming Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by <br />the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety' and <br />welfare of the community'. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.