06-17-2002 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The proposed conditional use is in accordance with the Municipal Code because an accessory structure on a through lot located in a "R" District is listed as a conditional use. 2. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safely or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed conditional use would not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare. The proposed acccssoiy stioicture (pool) is 20’ x 40' or 800 s.f. An accessor)’ structure of this size is to be located at least 15' from any property line. The closest property line the accessory structure is proposed to be located is approximately 100'. (Side property line- See Exhibit B). The other proposed accessory structure (sport court) is 45' x 28' or 1,260 s.f. An accessory structure of this size is to be located at least 30 ’ from property lines. The accessory structure is proposed to be located approximately 70' from the rear property line where 50’ is required and 30 ’ from the side property line as indicated on the survey. (Exhibit B). They both meet required setbacks. 3. That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Chapter. The use will not conflict with other provisions of the Zoning Chapter. Issues for Consideration; 1. Does Planning Commission find that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the neighborhood? 2. The accessory structures meet setbacks from both Countryside Drive W. and Old Ciystal Bay Road. 3. Does Planning Commission have any additional issues or concerns with this proposal? Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to construct a accessory structures (pool and sport court) on the property as proposed, meeting all required setbacks. U02-2784 Robert Tunheim 275} Countryside Drtve H'esf Page 2