My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
06-17-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:02:14 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:59:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINI TES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETLNG <br />Monday, April 15,2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(tf02*2771 OroDo Ambar, Continued) <br />is his belief another market analysis will be done with the second phase. GafTron indicated there are <br />two other parcels within the City that could be used for senior housing. <br />Mabusth staled she does also have a concern with the intersection and the amount of traffic that is being <br />added to this area. Mabusth stated in her view a semaphore is needed at this intersection <br />GafTron slated it is the desire that a semaphore be installed at that intersection by the time the first senior <br />housing building opens this fall. Gaffron indicated Staff is currently working with Ma'DOT on this <br />issue, with Ma/DOT’s position being that this intersection does not ha\e sufficient warrants to justify a <br />stoplight at this site. GafTron stated the need for a stoplight is based on the traffic count. <br />Hawn commented in her view the people are not op|v*,sed to the use but rather the height and mass of <br />the building. <br />Dunbar stated he does have a concern that there appears to be a misunderstanding concerning the first <br />senior housing building and the proposed office building. Dunbar stated they have complied w ith the <br />requirements of the City and are building the first building in conformance w ith the approved plans and <br />specifications. <br />Dunbar commented it was his belief that the residents would prefer a second senior housing building <br />rather than an office building. Dunbar stated he would like an opportunity to speak w ith the residents <br />regarding this project. Dunbar stated he would like to table his application <br />Hawn stated it is her belief the residents have a coiKcm with the length and height of the building that <br />would face their neighborhood. <br />Berg commented this type of build.ng is large for this area and perhaps would be better suited <br />clsew here, especuilly in light of phase one. <br />Hawn inquired how many people from Orono have leased space in the new building <br />Dunbar stated he is not aware of the e.xact numbers but a large number of them are parents of people <br />who live in Orono. Dunbar slated there also is a large number from the City of long Lake. <br />Hawn recommended the developer consider having a three-dimensional model of the project. <br />Dunbar stated he would be interested in doing that, particularly to demonstrate the differences between <br />the ofilce building project and the additional senior housing project <br />Kluth commented the developer at the time he was requesting approval of the office building concept <br />portrayed the office building in a very positive light, but now appears to be putting the office building in <br />a more negative light in order to gam approval fur the senior housing projeef. <br />Dunbar indicated he did speak with the residents rather candidly regarding the lights and the impact that <br />the office building would have on the area. Dunbar stated he is w illmg to lable this matter and is also <br />agreeable to meeting with the residents. <br />PAGE 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.