My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
06-17-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 4:02:14 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:59:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINI TES OK THE <br />ORO.NO i'Lanmm ; commission meeting <br />Monday, April IS. 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(002<2772 Jokn and Donna Crolleau, Continued) <br />he docs not have any further dclails at this time and will be anemptmg to contact the DNR in the future <br />regarding this applicalion. <br />Nowak stated he would like to nuke one correction, noting the addition extends 13 feet from the <br />existing house into the bluff area rather than 16 feel. Now ak staled they arc only building on area that <br />w*as modified when the house was built back in 1984, and will not be touching any virgin .soil. Nowak <br />stated they do not aniicipale the need to remove any large trees, noting a few small saplings nuy need to <br />be removed. Nownk indicated the water drains to the wetlands and eventually out into the lake. <br />Nowak staled w ith the garage addition they arc attempting to minimi/c the impact on the front of the <br />site, itoting there arc some older pine trees that they would like to retain. Nowak stated if the garage is <br />moved to the north 9.5 feel, the two pine trees would need to be removed. Nowak indicated they arc <br />willing to discuss the option of a detached garage. <br />Nowak distnbuied photographs of the property. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Rahn noted the surveyor indicated the lop of the bluff existed halfway through the proposed rear <br />addition, and inquired why Staff has located it elsew here. <br />Weinberger staled the difference is probably in the way the ordinance is interpreted, noting both are <br />within ten feet of each olha. <br />Smith inquired what the additional garage would be used for. <br />Mrs. Crotteau stated it is for additional garage space. <br />Nowak slated he did visit the site with Weinberger and looked at various sites fur a detached garage. <br />Nowak indicated there docs appear to be some merits to a detached garage and they are w illmg to <br />explore that option further. Nowak stated there arc a couple of options that could consider which would <br />olluvv the pine trees to be saved as well as meet the 10 foot setback. <br />Nownk indicated w here the tw o possible sites for a detached garage are <br />Klulh inquired how far the garage would need to be moved to make it comply w ith the setback. <br />Now^k stated the detached garage could be moved around 75 feet. <br />Mabusih inquired whether the existing landscaping would need to be removed in order to construct tlie <br />detached garage. <br />Nowak slated there are some pine trees in that area that could be saved Nowak staled he has spoken to <br />the neighbor who indicated they would prefer an attached garage to prevent headlights from shining into <br />their residence. <br />PAGE 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.