My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
03-18-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:33 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:31:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19,2002 <br />6:30 o ’clock p.m. <br />(#02-2751 Mark WHch, Continued) <br />StafT recommends approval of the application based on the hardships noted subject to the follo\\'ing <br />conditions: <br />I. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided 10' along the north lot line and S’ along the <br />interior property lines. <br />2. A final grading plan shall be submitted prior to review of the request uy the City Council. <br />3. The existing shed and all hardcover proposed for removal is completed prior to a final inspection. <br />4. Gravel shall be removed from the proposed parking area to leave a minimum 3' setbac'^. to the <br />property line. <br />Linda Welch stated she docs not have anytiung to add to Staff s report, noting she docs have pictures <br />of the embankment and the lot. <br />There were no public comments relating to this application. <br />Mabusth noted a lakeside deck is attached to the house, and questioned whether that is included as part <br />of the house footprint. <br />Weinberger stated the proposal only includes the house footprint and not the deck. Weinberger stated <br />this lot would be entitled to 1,500 square feet of structural coverage, noting the proposed house is <br />approximately 1,100 square feet. Weinberger stated the overhangs on the sides are approximately one <br />foot, with the overhang on the lakeside being approximately three feet. <br />Hawn inquired whether the overhang has been included in the structural coverage calculation. <br />Weinberger stated it has not been included. <br />Hawn stated since there is an existing house on this lot, the Applicant is entitled to a replacement, and in <br />her view the Applicants have done a pretty good job at designing the house. <br />Rahn inquired what the preferred width of a parking stall was. <br />Weinberger stated in a commercial parking lot a stall is 9 ’ by 20 ’, which is generally what is <br />recommended. <br />Rahn commented he was looking at other possible locations for the parking stall and whether that could <br />be reduced somewhat. <br />Gaffron indicated they would also need to be 20 ’ from a sewer tine. <br />Mabusth inquired where the well w ill be relocated to. <br />PAGE 31 <br />H
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.