My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-18-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
03-18-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:33 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:31:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19,2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#02-2755 Long Lake Fire Station, Continued) <br />Jabbour noted the majority of the colored drawings are being shown to the City of Long Lake tonight, <br />and apologized that Staff has a limited number of drawings available for the Planning Commission to <br />review. <br />Hawn inquired whether the Planning Commission should be looking at whether the hose tower should <br />be constructed. <br />GafTron stated the three issues the Planning Commission should address tonight relate to the <br />subdivision, the impact of the tow er on the neighborhood, and the setback variance. Gaffron stated the <br />City Council might be interested in hearing whether this building will be used for any ancillary uses and <br />the impact that would have on the surrounding neighborhood. Gaffron noted the use of the building is <br />not specifically related to any of the three issues Lefore the Planning Commission tonight. <br />Kluth inquired if there is an agreement on the ancillary uses, how that would be enforced. <br />Jabbour stated there could be a code amendment relating to municipal facilities. <br />Kluth inquired whether the City of Long Lake '•is agreed to those restrictions on its use. <br />Jabbour stated originally the building was expected to be constructed in downtown Long Lake, and little <br />by little the project moved into the City of Orono. Jabbour stated the committee in his view understands <br />what the intent of the building is, and that the neighbors need to understand what this project entails and <br />the impact that it will have on their neighborhood. <br />Kluth expressed concern that if there is no formal agreement on what t>pc of uses this building can be <br />used for, there may be problems in the future that could dramatically change the character of the <br />neighborhood. <br />Jabbour stated in his opinion the two cities should enter into a more formal agreement regarding the use <br />ol the building, and recommended the City of Orono consider adopting ordinances encompassing any <br />municipal building. <br />Kluth stated in his view there should be a formal agreement in writing that perhaps runs with the land, <br />such as a restrictive covenant on the land restricting its use. <br />Mabusth noted the building is located within the City of Orono and would therefore be subject to <br />Orono’s rules and regulations. Mabusth stated the City of Orono has strict regulations concerning liquor <br />consumption, et cetera. <br />Jabbour stated he is not suggesting that there w ill be large amounts of liquor on the property. <br />Kluth stated in his view the two eouncils and building committee will need to develop some tvpe of <br />agreement restricting the types of uses for this facility. <br />PAGE 17 <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.