Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANIVING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners Jeanne Mabusth, Daniel Kluth, Sandy Smith, David Rahn, <br />and Alternate J. Mark Fritzler. Commissioners William Stoddard and Janice Berg were absent. <br />The following represented City Staff: Planning Director Michael Gafffon, Zoning Administrator <br />Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, and Recorder Lin Vee. <br />Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. <br />CONSENT <br />(#01) #02-2750 MICHELLE AND EDWARD WINER, 2010 SHORELINT DRI\T, <br />variance <br />Hawn inquired whether there were any public comments relating to this application. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Smith inquired whether any of the neighbors have commented on this application. <br />Weinberger stated Staff did receive one call from a neighbor who was not opposed to the project. <br />Hawn moved. Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #02-2750, .Michelle and <br />Edward Winer, 2010 Shoreline Drive, granting of an average lakeshore setback variance to <br />construct the addition and deck to the existing residence. VOTE: Ayes 6, .Nays 0. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />(#02) #01-2731 NAVARRE AMOCO, 3360 SHORELINE DRIVE, CO.NLMERCIAL SITE <br />PLAN RE\TEW AND VARIANCES <br />Kluth moved. Smith seconded, to table Application #01-2731, Navarre Amoco, 3360 Shoreline <br />Drive, to allow the Applicant time to submit the requested items. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#03) #01-2735 PROPOSED ZONING CODE A.MENDMENT, SECTION 10.03, SUED. 14, <br />STRl'CTl'RAL LOT COVTRAGE ORDIN ANCE STANDARDS <br />Bottenberg stated what is before the Planning Commission tonight is a proposed change to the <br />zoning code dealing with structural lot coverage ordinance standards. Bottenberg noted the Planning <br />Commission had discussed this item in a number of work sessions, and nquired w hether there were any <br />changes or concerns by the Planning Commission relating to this item. <br />Kluth noted they were still working with the percentages. <br />PAGE 1