Laserfiche WebLink
GlTYofORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3186 __ <br />5. <br />again tabled on a vote of 4-0, with applicants being <br />directed to provide a grading and drainage plan to confirm <br />that runoff can be directed so as to not affect applicants ’ <br />proposed improvements nor neighboring properties. <br />A revised proposal (Plan D) was submitted and reviewed by <br />the Planning Commission at their September 21, 1992 meeting. <br />Plan D included porch and deck additions in the 0-75' <br />setback zone, addition of a second story above the existing <br />house, addition of a two story attached garage and rec room <br />with deck in the 75-250' zone, and construction of a new <br />driveway leading from the street to the attached garage. <br />The existing detached garage and parking area near the road <br />are proposed to be removed. <br />On a vote of 4 in favor, 3 against. Planning Commission <br />recommended approval of the hardcover and setback variances <br />necessary for construction of Plan D, based upon the <br />following findings: <br />a)Location of the existing garage is impractical for a <br />residential home, requiring homeowner to walk <br />approximately 175' from the garage to the residence. <br />The location of the existing house partially within the <br />0-75' setback zone is a factor over which applicants <br />have no control. <br />c)The unusal shape of the lot, being 50' in width at the <br />road and more than 150' in width at the shoreline <br />results in a relatively high hardcover percentage in <br />the 75-250' zone. The proposal results in a slight <br />hardcover decrease in the 0-75' zone. <br />The City Council has considered this application including <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, <br />reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and tne <br />effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />. welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 8