Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />Chair Hawn and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse. City Administrator <br />Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner <br />March 13, 2002 <br />SUBJECT: #02-2740 Jeffry & Nancy TwidwcII <br />1865 Concordia St. <br />Variance — Public Hearing <br />LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) <br />22,000 s.f. (.5 acre) <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />List of Exhibits <br />A Analysis Worksheet <br />B Sur\ey (i-.xisting) <br />C Site Plan (Proposed-Preferred) <br />D Preferred Plan Elevations/Floor Plans <br />E Preferred Plan Hardcover Calculations <br />F Letter from ApplicantsT^lardship <br />G Letter from Arborist <br />H Letter from Adjacent Neighbors <br />I Site Plan (Non-Preferred Option A & B) <br />J Non-Preferred Hardcover Calculations/Elevations/I loor Plans <br />K Site Photos show ini> trees <br />Pertinent Code Section: <br />I. Section 10.22. Subd. 2 and Section 10.56. Subd. 16 (L)(2); Hardcover in 75-250’: Within 75- <br />250' of the shoreline there shall be no greater than 25% hardcover, l o permit 4,797 s.f. (33.54%) <br />hardcover where 3,575 s.f (25%) is allowed. <br />.Application Summary: 1 he applicants own the subject property and arc requesting a hardcover <br />variance in the 75 250’ setback /one to construct a new residence on the lot. <br />Background: The applicant’s first two proposals were more e.xpansiv e than the plan now in front <br />of the Planning Commission. After reviewing the initial application, staff discussed lot coverage by <br />structures on the lot w ith the applicant, explaining •*'at structural co\ erage on the lot was increasing <br />and would be over the 15% allowed by city code. The applicant redesigned the residence to meet <br />the 15®/b lot coverage by structures for the property. However, hardcover in the 75-250’ /one still <br />exceeded the allowed amount. That proposal was on the agenda for the February Planning <br />Commission meeting. The applicants decided to table that application prior to the meeting to work <br />further with their design to better conform to city code. The applicant's have diligently done that. <br />1 his proposal further reduces the lot coverage by structures and hardcover in the 75-250’ setback <br />/one. I lowever. hardcover in the 75-250’ .setback zone still exceeds the 25% allowed by city code. <br />The proposed plan (Preferred Plan) locates the new residence behind the average lakeshore setback. <br />All the structure is located within the 75-250’ setback zone. The structure is 2.565 s.f (11.7"b) <br />which is well below the allowed 15%. <br />Jeffry >Sanc^' TmiJ^cII <br />IS65 Concur Jia Street <br />Varijnees <br />3 13/2002 <br />Page /