My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PEANMNC COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 19, 2002 <br />6:30 o ’clock p.m. <br />CialTron stated the tjpical situation wiUi a contractor is where thc>' all show up at the residence and then <br />lea\ e for the job site in the morning and are gone all day GafTron stated teclinieallN tliat could be <br />considered a dispatch center <br />Kluth pointed out the number of einpknees is co\ered in the ordinance Klutli staled the language in <br />Section 10 63 sort of implies that a uispatch center could be run out of a residence <br />Gatlron stated a business could also ha\e ofT-site empknees without opeialing as a dispatch center <br />since thc\ do not come to the residence <br />Hawn inquired whether a messenger or deli\cr> service would be considered a dispatch center <br />Kluth stated in his view there are a number of conditions in the ordinance that would help prevent <br />excessive noise and tratVic. <br />Mabusth stated the concern is how to deal with a property owner when the use becomes excessive <br />Gaffron suggested making that tv pe of business licensed to allow for more periodic rev iew bv the City <br />liawTi stated when this issue was first looked at back in 1998. it became clear there were a number of <br />existing businesses operating out of houses that were operating without licenses Hawn stated this <br />ordinance prov ides some standards for how those businesses should be operated <br />Rahn stated in Ins view there should be some tv pc of language to deal w ith a situation that might not be <br />cov ered under this ordinance <br />Smith stated the conditional use permit would allow additional standards to be imposed if needed <br />I lawn slated the Planning Commission needs to give some direction to StalTon whether additional <br />language should be added to the ordinance <br />Mabusth stated there should be some language in the ordinance tlut gives the Citv the abilitv to deal <br />with certain exemptions Mabusth stated in her view she would prefer a heense rather than a eondiiional <br />use |)erniit. and questioned whether it should be considered a special use license or entitled something <br />else Mabusth suggested Staff consult with the Citv Attoniev on the best method to utili/c <br />PAGE 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.