My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
area to be graded along Wildhurst Trail and will be directed to the new mitigated wetlands. This w ill <br />allow' the water to cross over as much land as possible before impacting the existing wetlands and <br />lake. <br />Sewer Location <br />A sewer line has recently been relocated out of the building pad of the lot. 1 he sewer line is now- <br />located about 10’ north of the south property line. Because of the sew er location it is not possible <br />to construct the proposed house to the 10’ side yard setback. The City Engineer has recommended <br />the house not be constructed w ithin 15 ’ of the sewer line. The result is a house that can not be built <br />within 25 ’ of the side property line. If the proposed house was allowed to be built only 10’ from the <br />property line, it could be done to not encroach into the wetland, and only have a partial impact on <br />the 26’ wetland buffer. <br />Since the line was relocated there is no record of a new utility and access easement being recorded <br />on the property. Because of the man hole locations on the property and sewer line the City may be <br />required to access the property for routine maintenance, hence an easement is necessar>-. <br />Citv' Engineer Comments <br />City Engineer comments are attached as Exhibit F. <br />Review of Hardships <br />1. The property met all code requirements in 1991 and was considered a buildable lot at that <br />time. The new wetland boundary as determined by Aquatic EcoSolutions. Inc.. Golden <br />Valley. iMinnesota. show s a larger wetland basin than what w as thought to be located on the <br />property. <br />2. The larger wetland basin causes two development issues for the property owners. First, the <br />wetland basin's size has limited the building envelope to a small comer of the property. 7 he <br />area available to develop is then substantially reduced by the required 30 ’ setback to the back <br />property line and side yard setback. <br />3. Becau.se the area of the wetland is larger than first believed, the actual area of the lot is <br />reduced in size to le.ss than one acre. The City of Orono did find in 1991 that the area of the <br />property was 1 acre. The change to the wetland dctemiination method has changed the <br />defined lot area of the property, as has the ability to credit w etland as buildable area. <br />4. The location of the sew er service 1 O' from the south property line shifts the building location <br />an additional 15 ’ to the north, which causes the wetland impact. If a house could be <br />constructed at the 10’ setback the proposed development would not impact the wetland. <br />5. 1 he property owners have identified areas on the property to mitigate a total of 2,180 s.f. of <br />wetland on the property to compensate for the wetlands lost to fill and structures. <br />i02-2745 Ilona and Kenneth Pe'er&on <br />1074 Wildhuni Trail <br />Tebruaf) 19, 2002 <br />Page 3 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.