My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
02-19-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:34:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
« •* » <br />D <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF <br />NO. <br />^HJE CITY COUNCIL <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING REN*EWAL OF VARL<VNCES <br />TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 ANT) 2 <br />FILE NO. 2531 <br />WHEREAS, Roger Olsen and Elizabeth Olsen (hereinafter "the applicants”) are <br />“r civ") d"d« <br />Lot 2, Block 2, Partenwood (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />., . . , the applicants have applied to the Cit>* for the renewal of variances <br />to . IJrucipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 to allow the remodelins and <br />expansion of the existing residence to include a four stall garage and additional living space <br />located from the 929.4 ordinary high water mark where 75’ is required and requirmz a <br />hardcover van^ce of 4,413 s.f (15.3%) where 5,815 s.f. (20%) is e.xisting and none is allowed <br />as shown on Exhibit A. <br />Minnesota: <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES0L\T:D by the City Council of Orono, <br />F..'’DESGS <br />1. <br />0 <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File ii2531. <br />The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br />Zoning District requiring one acre in area. The property consists of 1.02 acre. <br />J.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this renewal application on October <br />18, 1999 and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the <br />following fmdings: <br />1. The proposed additions would not further encroach on the OHWL. <br />Page 1 of 5 <br />tiUm
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.