My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-2002 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
01-22-2002 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 3:32:38 PM
Creation date
2/16/2023 3:30:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLLTIO.N OF THE Cm’ COITVCIL <br />NO. - <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 18, 1993, <br />and recommended approval of the proposed variance application as amended <br />based upon the following findings: <br />A.The proposed improvements to the propertv- result in a reduction of <br />hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone from 27>.7>% to 19.75^, although no <br />improvements are proposed in that zone. Further hardcover in the 75- <br />250 ’ zone will be reduced from the current level of 72% down to 58.2%, <br />a reduction of approximately 1,128 s.f. hardcover. <br />B.Based on the existing drainage patterns of the property, runoff produced <br />from the structures placed within the 75-250 ’ setback area will not drain <br />directly to the lake but will drain to the street which drains directly to the <br />lake, hence the proposed hardcover reductions in the 75-250 ’ zone are <br />desirable. <br />C.No major land alterations are proposed as a result of the structural <br />improvements. <br />D.The increase in lot coverage by structures is not incongruous with the <br />basic development pattern of the immediate neighborhood. <br />The current variance request is a revision of Application iir 1750/Resolution #3183 <br />which included the family room addition and relocation/construction of a new <br />detached garage. The garage is no longer a pan of the proposal. <br />Tlie City Council finds that the conditions existing on this propeny are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zo.ning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serv'e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.