Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING GOr^USSIOl MESmiG OF OCTOBER 21, 1975 - PAGE 4 <br />0 <br />C <br />The Zoning Administrator explained that on May 29th of this RICHARD NCOUL <br />year, a contractor applied for a permit for concrete hard- VARIANCE - HAR <br />cover at the Richard Noll residence. He yias denied the permit 3587 NQPSH SN <br />and informed of the variance requirement and that a crushed <br />rock or open wood type deck would be permitted. A violation <br />tag was issued after the owner inst2dled about 740 sq. ft. <br />of concrete hardcover within the 75 ft. Icdceshore setback <br />Idmite. Mr. Noll pleaded guilty in District Court. Sen- <br />taicing was scheduled for November 7th, pending review by <br />the Council concerning the application. The GoRRiission rosm- <br />bers infoxmed Mr. Noll that there was no way under the pre­ <br />sent code to allow this. Mr. Noll stated ttat the area was <br />a mudhcle and every time it rained it would fl 'iod the house <br />caning up to the wires in the house. Harry Joi^isai, a neigh­ <br />bor and the man who eventually installed tlie concrete, said <br />there was a four foot hole outside the door and in order to <br />get into the house it was necessary for everyone to jump over <br />it. I4r. Johnson was asked v4iy he did not apply for a variance. <br />He replied that he didn't know that there hadn't been and <br />did the work just to help Noll out. The Zoning Administrator <br />noted that in most situations no permit is required for slabs <br />or concrete. The owner felt that crushed rock or wood would <br />not be a solution to the problem because wood was originally <br />ttere and that the only possible solution was by concrete. <br />moved,/U(&r seconded, tl^t the Planning Conmissicn <br />reccnmend to the Council denial, of the variance application <br />of Richard Noll due to the 75 ft. hardcover setback require­ <br />ment; because the CoRinissicn felt that added hardoovar was <br />not the only solution to the drainage problem and because <br />Mr. Noll was made aware of the hardcover restrictions and <br />variance procedures but proceeded with the work. Motion, <br />Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />B DRIVE <br />Kermit Eisinger requested a variance within four foot of the <br />lot line in order to construct a new detached two car garage. <br />Mr. Eisinger stated that the variance was necessary because <br />of an existing driveway and he would have to refill the vAiole <br />driveway to remake the site. He stated that other neic^ibors <br />had hcu^ and garages on the lot lines. Ohe Coimission noted <br />that there was plenty of room at the site and could see at <br />least three other solutions to the situation. I4r. Eisinger <br />stated that after 28 years it was too hard to redesign a pro­ <br />perty and felt it a hardship to live in a neighborhood vdiere <br />he hM bemi denied vdiat others residing there have. licDcnald <br />moved, Pesek seconded, that the Planning Coimission table the <br />Kermit Eisinger application so that an alternate plan could <br />be presented. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0), <br />KEEMIT EISINGER <br />VARIANCE - SH£ YARD <br />40 SMTIH AVENUE <br />O <br />Van Nest moved, McDonald seconded, that the Planning Coirois- <br />sicn reoGRmend to the Council approval of the street setback <br />variance request of Edwin Sandin for a new garage subject to <br />the removal of the old gzuage prior to construction. Motion, <br />Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />mm smm <br />VARIANCE - FRCMT SETBACK <br />1186 17HDHURST TRAIL