Laserfiche WebLink
HANNING C3QMMISSI0N I'®EEING OF OCTOBER 12, 1975 - PAGE 2 <br />^Attorney Janes Diracles ^^peauDsd to represent the Cheyenne <br />f^and Oanpany ^.11 their rezening petition. The Planning Com­ <br />mission proceeded to review the sunmarization and staff re­ <br />ports ooncjeming the matter. It was noted that the Cenpre- <br />hensivG Plan and zoning package prepared for the Village <br />maintained that a two acre tract is minirnin acreage for tre <br />area. Bie n^jorts confirmed that the traffic system feeding <br />the land was a bad one with dangerous comers and viaduct <br />and in the middle of Hic^hRo^y DeparlmenL plans for future <br />routing of Highwsy #12. The Oonmission felt that all tte <br />maps produced shc»»d hardly any or no method of rerouting <br />around the tract. Th^ noted conoems of neighbors about <br />the possibility of sewer ceming into the area and that the <br />lands feeding Tanager Lake draineige system should keep hard <br />cover to a mininun. Mr. Diracles asked to cocract an in­ <br />accuracy vhich was tl^t the houses would not be constructed • <br />on one acre lots until the area was sewered. The Attorney <br />agreed that a street problem existed now, that the problem <br />needed iirmediate attention and the vpgrakng would handle <br />any difference in traffic caused by the rezoning application. <br />Mr. Diracles stated that recent developments in the Hi^way <br />Department shoRoed that construction plans ware tabled in- <br />def^tely. He also felt that a problem with hard cover <br />\ioild be compensated by sewering the property. Bake noted <br />that water studies show that a major source of poUutiai <br />is runoff and to him it seemed the area would be taxed by <br />gthe double amount of hardcover. Diracles stated it would <br />^ot be double as much. The Zoning Aaministrator felt that <br />approval would be spot rezoning and noted that other de­ <br />velopers haeve had to oanply and hare the burden of this <br />zoning classification. Pes^ stated that there must be <br />a definite reason for rezoning and that keeping the area <br />ti-fo acres does not deny the owner use of the land. The <br />Attorney felt the location of the site would justify re“ <br />zening because of its proximify to Long Lake axKi a one <br />acre tr^siticn area would be beneficial. Diracles noted <br />tliat this area was more conveniently sewered than other <br />two acre areas. Van Nest disagreed and cited his view, <br />after walking the tract, that it x^ould be extremely cbetly <br />to sewer reqidring at least three lift stations. Diracles <br />stated that if sewering is not annmy-i ah^d th^ would only <br />acre lots. The Attorn^ adso felt rezoning would <br />be ji^tified due to the shape of the wetlands making it <br />difficult to divide the site into two acre tracts. Veoi <br />Nest noted that Old Orchard Road was part of the Parkway <br />system and that the overpasses proposed to be taken out hai <br />been considered a part of the scenic portion to that plan. <br />V^ Nest moved, Dunlap seconded, that the Planning Cenmis- <br />sion recxxnmend to the Oouncil ttot based on staff reports <br />Pertaining to the rezoning application of Cheyenne Land <br />Cdipany, the application be denied and ordered stoff to <br />■-—draft a Resolution for Planning Oonmission review setting <br />V.-^orth their reasons for denial of the rezoning petition. <br />Motion, Ayes (7) - lOays (0). <br />CHEYENNE lAND COMPANY <br />REZONING APPLICATION <br />100 QRDNO ORCHAFD6 ROAD