Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />RMtOMS OOMOSSiaiuHC - SEF1EMBER 3, 1975 - BKB 4 <br />EnglnBer but pcoduioed wpoci fications cxnoBuiing si <br />'Aqpiaa^ unit at the site. This %«as to be located at the <br />back of the Ixiilding. iSiothBr oono em of the Ocnmissiai <br />had been bail tank mm-off and its effect on the envixonaent <br />Oothnann ocntacted several beit store oMnexs idio e^ittated <br />run-off to be 8 to 10 gallons ixi a 24 hout period. Brad <br />Gess, of the Freshwater BLologleal Ihstitute twas oontaeted <br />vmrm - r. goimiii# <br />oont. <br />and asked to deter«nine the slgnificanoe of this_________ <br />Be oo ncluded it woeld take 3.7 ndliion years for this to tate <br />hold in the lake end concluded that if the beit shop could <br />stay in hisinesa for 2,000 years, HlBiagers vould be the best <br />bay in Lake HLmetonka; nakiiig hobs that the bail store v«ter <br />i. <br />I <br />i. <br />iilH If I If ill Si II1 ■ <br />WMld be cleaner than the bay* Supplies only be deli- <br />- - - _ _ _ _ • A •_ _._ _• A 4 ^ Mm. ^ ^ _ <br />r: <br />*”— —» day per mek and the nal^d^jum Ajjtpn cns icm or a ' <br />bait shop at that location because of tezaxds with traffic at <br />Paul's landing and the Closing of the Wayzata Balt Shop. The <br />Planning Oomnission felt that approval should be subject to <br />the cmdition that no docks be aUcwad because of a fhture <br />possibility of a ormwRPcial marina venture. Mr. Cbthnann in- <br />e <br />dicated he would like a dock so boat traffic pin to <br />bait, ixml^ip moved, Hannah seconded, after into <br />oonsideration the excessively mmiy size of the lot and the <br />t,:3 ncn-oonfonning uses at the site, that the Flaming <br />Ooimission zeccmnend to the Ooiaicil the i^ipcaval of the Goth <br />varianoe application for a bait Shop at 1440 Shoreline Drive <br />subject to the foUcwing conditions: <br />' ‘ i,':. i . <br />j.. No otr.er marina uses be permitted in the granting of <br />bait shop including docks. <br />2. Sewage conditions must meet the regulreroents of the Vil­ <br />lage Engineer. <br />3. Structure will not be enlarged under the existing ocndi- <br />ticns. <br />4. 7!:iat the four year landscaping plan as siihnltbed be car­ried out. <br />5. That thsikquazyme unit be screened and located at least <br />10 £t. fran any lot line and not be on the street side of «iy <br />structure. <br />6. aiiis variance to be subject to annual review. <br />Motion, Ayes (8) - Ikys (0). <br />van Nest moved. Hake seconded, ttet the Planning Odnmiesion <br />reooninend to the Oouncil appisoval of the Final Plat of chwTl^ <br />Spear for 3640 Bayside Road. Motion, ;yes (7) - Nm (0) - <br />Abstain (1) Pesek <br />FINAL FIAT - C. SPEAR <br />3640 BASSIDE ROAD <br />.’J <br />O <br />Rake moved, Hannah seoondad, that the Planning Oomniaaion <br />reocinn^id to the Oouncil approval, as submitted, of a <br />ner-lot side yard setback vazimoe in the construction <br />a - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -• - - V e j « ^ <br />VARIANCE - W. NICHCIDS <br />2700 SRADXNQGD ROAD <br />the property of William Nichols <br />Shadywood Road. Motion, iyes (8) - NSsrs (0). <br />nie Planning Oomnissicn requested John Guthrie to A<ariMMi <br />the Gocd Shepl-^ird Church situation with the Oouncil. Ote <br />members felt that hecause they held the pibllc hearing the <br />Oouncil did not get enough input from the public. <br />eot i SHEFIS8D CHBCH