Laserfiche WebLink
MM <br />^ . •• <br />© <br />cm OF GRDNONI] <br />JOCULAR FIAmiNB OGMIESSION ICEllMS JELD SEnSCBR 3, 1975 <br />Ite (koio Planning Oonmiasion nat on the dmve date <br />with the following manbere preaent: Chalznan John <br />P. Bake, Hannah, ^ Meet, Gothrie, Dunlap, Feaek, <br />McDonald and Qirtie. toning Administrator, Hank NOhich. <br />Absent: ICallestad and Mbolley. <br />The Chairman announoad that this was the time and plar^ <br />for a Public Hearing to be held oonoa ming the imming <br />Application of the Chavenna Land Ocapany, for 100 Cfeono <br />The Public Bearing Notice ____ <br />applicant, iTipi^enUid by Atbocnay Dirmeles and Richard <br />MesUnd, presented their reguest to rezone fran the cur- <br />» density requinanent to one acre zoning for <br />He said that the area was adjacent to <br />the prop o sed Heyzata-<taio Sauer tetaroaptor and that <br />would <br />• I • ' <br />> sawar Board hod not, as yit, a date for beginning <br />on the project, lhay felt that one acre would be a <br />good transition betuecn the adjacent neighborixxsds of <br />Icng Lake having quarter acre zoning and Wayzata. A Let­ <br />ter to Mr. Diracles from C. E. Bumill of the State High­ <br />way Departmant, was presented. It stated that thay saw <br />no problem tdth inplace Hi^diev 12 although the proposed <br />oeveicpnant would include cdoout 1500 feet of the new Bigb- <br />WBV 12 aligRTent and conflict %d.th the Orono Ooaprehensive <br />The developer stated that future platting of the <br />land would dedicate approDdnately <br />according to a letter from the Orono Village Bigineer, <br />each lot %nuld have one acre of dry usable land. Kermit <br />Bisinger, a resident living south of the tracks, asked for <br />an explaination of the Higtemy Department letter. The <br />Planning Ocnroission eoiplained that th» HighNay has only <br />HighMev 12 devel _ <br />that the State has not taken a definete stand on the route. <br />Nancy Bergereon <br />blame off Highway 12, the drainage effect on her property, <br />probleBBS. She requested the Planning Ocnmission <br />to stop the applicant. She %ms told that they would not <br />want to deiy the osier of the rl^itful use of tte Irnid. <br />Mrs. Bergerson, after viewing preliminary maps, stated timt <br />the claimed dry land vms not dry but wet. The Planning Oom- <br />mi salon viewed the new wetlands map that oonfinwnd that the <br />specific area in question did contain some wetlands. There <br />was some question as to the extent of the wetlan <br />on the map, homver, so the Zoning AdteLnistrator <br />to oontact the Bigineer, Mr. ICennkiy and <br />tions mi'v'it be necessary. The Planning Ooandssion expressed <br />.ts to the effect on properties across Orono Orchard <br />ir>ad and whether any rezoning <br />include a larnr area than just the imnediate proposal <br />Oonmissi©Si'SiJS lon mBnabsTB considered the soon Lc hardship <br />of bringing sewer into the area as sewering generates more <br />larger tracts <br />in the area is not able to handle stoon water and deposits <br />more nutrients into Lake Mimetonka. It was felt the cost <br />to correct the effects on the lake would be more expensive <br />thmi sewer. The menbers questioned whether a transition a: <br />AlTEIIlANaB - 7:10 P.M. <br />ORONO VILLAGE HAU. <br />PUBLIC mmm - ie <br />100 GRGNO OBCaiPD ROM) <br />5 <br />J <br />1 <br />i <br />■ <br />I .. 1 <br />i <br />4 <br />i <br />Jl1 <br />•u. <br />t