My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-1975 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
07-14-1975 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2023 8:37:59 AM
Creation date
2/16/2023 8:37:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F <br />O <br />i> <br />.; / r . <br />e <br />b>- * <br />r ^ <br />L <br />PLANNING ACTICN niGTlNG - July 14, i9/.S Page 7 <br />Curtis made tlie jTotion thiat tlie Planiiinp Comnission rec- <br />OBinend approval cf Dennis Sulii\^*s praposal on the <br />condition that he rip rap with notliuig but rock. <br />Van Nest seconded. <br />Ayes (7), Mayes (0). <br />DKvINIS .mLIVAN - <br />RIP PAP PERMIT <br />The Planning Conniissioji stated that a variance from the <br />street setback requirement vculd also be necessary. <br />This is a substandard parce]. SJjpportjiig an adequate <br />structure. <br />MJRIEI. SENN- <br />VARIANCE, LAKESrORH <br />SETBACK f, IIARPOn'ER <br />Diane Dunlap made the motion to reccmiend denial of the <br />variance. Pesek seconded. <br />Ayes (7), Mayes (0). “ <br />.» . <br />The Planning Commission pointed out several points to be <br />reviewed in considering this proposal, such as a cash <br />Park dedication fee in lieu of tlie pro7X)sed land dedi <br />cation, as the Park Board felt several existing ccnditioiis <br />RfiJLRI FJRMETr- soOTT pimnonf <br />PLATTING <br />mi^t restrict its use-(the wet and marsh coiiditUcis, access, <br />and t:traffic along County Rd. #15), feasability of extending <br />private road from properties to the nortli for providing <br />private road on this development, and the intended use of the <br />lakeshore strip of land across County Road #15, whether this <br />strip was to be included as a part cf the individual parcels <br />for accessary use of private docks or community docks. The <br />tot^l area of the 7 proposed parcels is 13.7 acres excluding <br />the buildable land on cutlot 8 and the lake^diore strip across <br />County Road #15. The develqx’r was also reminded to chedc <br />all seli>acks of existing buildings to asstire setback require <br />ments. <br />The Planning Ccronission scheduled a public hearLig on tlie <br />proposal for 7:15 on August 4, 1975. <br />Hank presented the proposal of Good Shepherd on the Conditional GOOD SHEPHERD UJTHERAM <br />Use to use the existing parsonage as a daytiiiie activity CONDITICl^IAi- U5E <br />center for the developmentally delayed.PEPMIT FOR DAYAcrrvnY center <br />Joyce Olson, representative for tlie day activity center <br />stated that Good Shepherd is licensed by the Stat<j 5 that <br />'they have to follow the State guide lines and th?.i; the <br />facilities do meet all the state requirements, *niis <br />cause is funded by the State, Federal end County. The <br />day activity center is a separate non-profit organixaticn <br />and is not affiliated with the church. The program would <br />be designed for preschool children, primarily from birth to <br />the age of 18 months. <br />^ ■ <br />—*
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.