Laserfiche WebLink
r T <br />m <br />i <br />o <br />\ <br />L <br />cmr OF onoNO <br />Work Session with Special Action Items of the Planning <br />Comiassion, May 5, 1975.7:30 p^m. <br />The Planning Coadssion met on the above date with <br />the following members present: Chairman Guthrie, Fesek, <br />McDonald, Curtis, Van Nest, Hake, Dunlap, Hannah. <br />Absent: Gasch, Kallestad, Wboley <br />Van Nest moved, Curtis seconded approval of the Minutes <br />of the ^il 22, 1975 meeting with the following MiNurcs <br />corrections: <br />1. Correct misspelling of Lomar "HiL <br />2. Strike line" a need for additional room" <br />substitute "Ihis was not an excessive use of <br />the lot". <br />3. List members absent from meeting. <br />Motion, Ayes (8), Nay (0). <br />Oberhauser, Mr. Nafstad, and Mr. Credin were present <br />for this proposal. After reviewing the proposal and <br />discussing possible dianges in the structures and site <br />plan, the request was withdrawn by the applicant until <br />sj^ time that they could prepare new plans with no more <br />than five structures with total occupancy not to exceed <br />ten living units. <br />The^^anning Conadssion reviewed the stbdivision proposal <br />as presented by Mr. Patch who was present. The frawii iTfrm <br />hesitated to approve the proposal as the only means of ' <br />fnmi the northwest parcel was directed to Co. Rd. <br />#6. They felt the safety and welfare of the public should <br />be considered and therefore an access to Tamarack Drive <br />should be provided for any possible future sibdivision <br />of this northMast parcel whereas traffic could be directed <br />onto Go. Rd. #6 from Tamarack Drive. They, therefore, <br />requested an additional SO* wide strip along the north <br />ed|^ of the east parcel be included with the northwest <br />parcel. The applicant felt this would not fit in with <br />his original plans. <br />li IIThe Planning ^ <br />by egress to Tamarack Drive could be provided. oiSer- <br />wise the proposal as presented would require a public <br />hearing. <br />Pesek moved. Hake seconded that a Public Hearing be held <br />on Jiaie 2, 1975, regarding the above. Motion, Ayes (8) <br />Nay (0). <br />HERRICK C <br />SUBDIVISION <br />#13 Roger Patch <br />6th Avenue N. <br />WwM: <br />i <br />! , <br />, s^ I