Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
€ <br />0 <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 19, 1973 Page 3 <br />Mr. Ankeny expressed that he would have no <br />objTOtion to combining Pcrcel B of his <br />Registered Land Survey witii the rest of his <br />property to the south to avoid land*locking <br />the parcel. <br />DIVISION <br />Ankeny <br />Van Nest noved, Gasch seconded, that approval <br />of Mr. Ankeny's division be granted on the <br />condition that he combine Parcel B with Lots 5 <br />and 6 to the soutn. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Gasch felt that the commission should first <br />determine whether Mr. Lofrano's proposed <br />garage would create too much hard cover on <br />his lot. Since the concept of allowing a <br />garage on ^h. Lofrano's property had already <br />been approved by the Council and Planning <br />Commission, it was felt that our only <br />concern should be what kind of setback from <br />the railroad property should be required. <br />Chairman Poisson warned t]iat any sunken wall <br />that is as close to a property line as <br />indicated in I!r. Lofrano's proposal should <br />be able to withstand more than normal stress <br />requirements. Heavy equipment,such as trucks, <br />on railroad property could cause the walls to <br />buckle according to the cliairman. <br />Van Nest moved, Gasch seconded, that a <br />variance be granted subject to a survey <br />showing that a minimum of one foot remain <br />between the proposed garage and the rear <br />property line. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />The Planning Commission agreed that Mr. <br />Howell's property seemed to be more ideally <br />suited for two homes rather than four <br />because of the contour of the land. <br />Gasch moved. Van Nest seconded, that the <br />request be denied because the area and width <br />variance would be too large, the natural <br />contour of the land would be destroyed if <br />four houses were constructed on this parcel, <br />and also, smaller lots would not be compatible <br />with the character of the surrounding one*acre <br />lots. Motion, Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Mr. Potas explained to the Planning Commission <br />that the scaled drawing of his new addition <br />was incorrect and the overhang would not go <br />over the property line, but would end <br />approximately 3 inches inside his property. <br />Mr. Potas told tlie Commission that he assumed <br />(Continued) <br />VARIANCE <br />Lofrano <br />DIVISION « VARIANCE <br />Howell <br />VARIANCE <br />Potas