Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF h REGULAR MEETING HELD DECEMBER 17, 1973 Page 4 <br />O <br />Name <br />Mr. Karr <br />D. Curtin <br />Attorney for project <br />Representative of <br />Hr. Green <br />Mr. Twidwell <br />Mr. Navin <br />C <br />Gloria HcDonalil <br />Brad Van Nest <br />Mr. Curtin <br />lire. Bohn <br />llrs. tfoolley <br />J. Sather <br />Connents <br />Approval of this application would furthe <br />increase the amoOnt of hardcover in the <br />area. Also, what type of docking <br />facilities have they proposed? <br />The petitioners have r.ade no mention of <br />docks in their preliminary reports becaus <br />lake traffic is of secondary ii^>ortance <br />to the business and any type of limita* <br />tions suggested by the LMCD or the Villag <br />would be observed. <br />Mr. Green favors the restaurant proposal <br />because he feels that it would tend to <br />upgrade the neighborhood. <br />Since the LMCD is talking about creating <br />a "quite waters area” on Maxwell Bay, <br />it seems contradictory to approve a <br />project that woUld increase lake traffic.^ <br />The light and noise %rhich come from a <br />restaurant would be incompatible with <br />the surrounding residential area. <br />Can the Village stipulate that all noise <br />must be contained within the building? <br />Mould the petitioner be willing to get <br />approval conditioned on no dock rights? <br />It would be possible to contain any noise <br />within the building and lake traffic <br />has always been viewed as secondary in <br />importance. <br />The problem is that there is too much <br />land zoned lakeshore ccxnmercial. If thisi <br />A «land had been zoned residential, there <br />would be no problem. <br />This use would undoubtedly generate SK>rc : <br />traffic which necessitates improved roads <br />The proposed restaurant vrould be an isi- <br />provement on existing conditions and it <br />is something that is needed in the Villag« <br />A letter from Mr. Keller was read, stating <br />his support for the restaurant. Letters <br />from Mr. & I4rs. Willis and Mr. a <br />were cited again and included as <br />14rs. Gutterson <br />part of the file. <br />Chairman Paurus asked for a show <br />who were opposed and in favor of <br />Approximately 70-80 were opposed, <br />of hands for those <br />the restaurant. <br />(Continued)