12-10-1979 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' • 18S »•*“ 15 NORTH WESTERN REPORTER. M SERIES for the BiWwin* warning h|W ^ «ooe1Unt$ the district court, by order timie the use of the vacsied 2ted*Seplember 23. 1943, refused to set he would be subject to 1*C 9 enraged aside iu former decree so as to permit a|^ doing to." Bergren SJ ^anu to be heard in opposition to the hi,pre^ta^^ey t^nv*«^^^ **“ **** happcnc^ tlie 19€2 dtCTCc and dca I is froin th*t order, of a »o»^to appear in op- jjj | Throughout. €w>nnit the Berrrens to appear in op- | Throughout the proceeoings o Jhe vacation of the «reet was owners have ^phtjuea JSiTupon the Baldwins, as well as u^ ^ of the vacated the oc«Snt and record owuct of other . „„et or thoroughfare ai^ «r«oertv. and upon the chairman . ,pp,jj,nn have another «ree» " and record ow»^ of other . „„.t or *oroughUr« aij * ^fMiertv •nd upon the chiirman o ^ appelUnts hivt another street as AcofS^I witice of nKH ^ncctn to their property, iTtiTiiAr*^" **’*”* s^cutm” - - *• 7: i^riliir^^ings. They relied mamty upon t ■^□KH^fflfl«och consideration to the cUims (1) that the Bergrens had not b^ |® Street, located as it is on the ^Tuk. sl^ I„d.« • f g'Hii Til ifflii Himii M itrMt or thoroughfare untU Baldwins filled in a portion ^Uke |trw ,l,o„ of Ae bay. .djacent to the county r~d.^m«-^ Vj , 1|rilir,n^ Sf'srr “ca^eS'pSr y miess to the public fw *>»« *S l!!l!!Lr nublii^ numoses," J« « for >* for p«- PetltSm ol^i^t'^. ^ 259 K used by the public w by apyw* . , w eop 530 beadnote: !!I1 of Ae location of said street boo* between private individuals wth mem sooincrij cw vn wawa Supporting the Baldwina ta their ^i.Mt7 abounds, are of r*»» to prevent a reopening of tlw (teipwunce," Witty v. Board of Co^ were the three toi^ 'rJrrfrs of NicoUet County. 76 alMarif asserted that. "PT ^79 N.W. 112. 113. and thu court has with notice of the original neanng ~ i„ protKung tn^ they had made a complete investi^ i.«,«.».« » State. 52 Minn. 181, 53 N.W. and had concluded that the portioo of L.ILA. 670, 38 Am.St.Rep. Ml; Suemhere invMved "wa. -o good for^ £^1^^117 Minn. 369. 135 N. purpose for which it was laid out JJ 1S3 ' Mate v. Korrer, 127 Mum. «, public by the Erickschen v. County of Sib^. Min^mpervisora farther depoaod"ttot ^ ggs; in ful purpom would be ler supra; In re Petition ®* inter^^the public woaM be ^ „^V2d 803; Petraborg v. by urder of thu court selimg as^ tb^ N^ ,74 2ilrjust what beneit the puMic ^ ^c»'. iSll And where, a. here, it is js^rt^LS si:3*t jLr ^ h • \ r*2