Laserfiche WebLink
regular meeting of the ORONO.council, JULY 28, 1980 <br />work^mrt application and contended that <br />itL?eS competing work <br />Commission reviewed PlanningThe Plann?n„ X . • application on this basis.Commission denied the guest house <br />75 fili and variance for work within <br />ln.bujty to ,ta„t <br />couldh^M«2? ® another non-conforming use (guest <br />bS Si • ?“ ‘"is finding, if Sheld <br />frjaUn, aS^ei ItoifcSaid ^“SoMSfSieS'wiSr"®" <br />two-“SJ SSctiirS SLin.“^^°" *’■‘*“"9 <br />Planning Coiranission meeting however new <br />SiSse^SfS h-£continuing similar violations. "istory of <br />received from neighbor <br />Siie"lcSnS!" inspector <br />collapsed before inspection by Mike ScheUer ' <br />2. The permit issued in 1971 was never intended to <br />cover anything except a one-story 20* x 30' boat <br />SSS*hn ‘’Sfrri“' ^orywithout authority ^ <br />. a’nTiiSh^Jn?? “nal inspeit‘Ln <br />In addition, the 1980 assessed fair market vai«« <br />removal Of any non-conforming structure with an^ <br />36 ~Shs ofy , 1975 or no later than January 1, 1978. <br />Page 16 <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMI' <br />2480 Casco Point Road <br />(Continued) <br />•fw upheld an injunction ordering compliance <br />SSSr^rs’2SsSoi?*"“ <br />concurrence with the Planning Commission <br />and in light of the new information, i recommend denial <br />conditional use permits and variances <br />and I further recommend ordering removal of all second' <br />story construction which has neCer been permliJed? and <br />remove the entire structure consistent with Section 31.106. <br />(Continued)