My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1979
>
11-26-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:41:23 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Telephone 473-7.’l57 <br />CITYof ORONO <br />Poet Office Bo« 6<i*CryeUl Bey. MinnceoU 55323* Municipal OfTicee <br />On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />November 13* 1979 <br />Honorable Jerry Mevissen, Mayor <br />Mr. Vern Genzlinger, Planning Commission Chairman <br />Council and Planning Commission Members <br />City of Independence <br />Rt. He Box 123A <br />Maple Plain, MN 55359 <br />Dear Mayor Mevissen and Chairman Genzlinger: <br />Thank you for providing the City of Orono the opportunity to review <br />and comment on your proposed Comprehensive Plan. <br />The goals and plans of Independence appear to be consistent with <br />and supportive of those of Orono. <br />We agree that agriculture or quasi-agricultural uses are important <br />to our area and that spreading urban density is definitely an <br />exclusionary type of land use which destroys the social fabric of <br />a rural community. We too believe that low density rural-residential <br />land use should be an acceptable permanent use, especially on the <br />type of land in our area. <br />Your continued reliance on the rural centers of other municipalities <br />for urban-type services is the same philosophy as ours - shared <br />services without unnecessary, uneconomic duplication. <br />Your existing (and proposed) 5 acre residential zoning is identical <br />with our existing zoning on the area which is expected to r^ain <br />the same. Orono is not presently considering a 1 to 40 agricultural <br />zone because we do not have the active agricultural uses that you have. <br />As for transportation, Orono does not now foresee any major re <br />construction or relocation of highway 12. As you know, however, <br />we are currently completing a new road connecting County 19 with <br />County 6 which we expect will improve route choices in the area <br />and also attract drivers away from Lake Minnetonka and County 15 <br />We have yet to see what effect this will have on the County's <br />plans for 110 and 19. <br />i <br />^ 1 <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.