My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1979 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1979
>
11-26-1979 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2023 1:41:23 PM
Creation date
2/15/2023 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TO:Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />FROM: Michael Cfaffron, Septic System Inspector <br />DATE:November 16, 1979 <br />SUBJECT:#529 Steve Wallack (TMG Dev.), 1400 Sixth Avenue North <br />PAINTER CREEK SUBDIVISION <br />The proposed subdivision is for 11 new lots plus 2 new lots to <br />be included and combined with existing parcels. Total area of <br />the project includes about 110-120 acres of which about 40% <br />is designated wetland and an additional portion is low and could <br />not/should not be considered as "dry buildable." (Glencoe and <br />Hamel soils). After my field inspection of this property, I <br />would say the proposal is optimistic in that much of the land <br />not designated as wetland is, nevertheless, wet, has a seasonal <br />very high water table, and is not conducive to development. <br />My comments and recommendations based on soils, topography and <br />the location of contiguous dry land areas, are as follows: <br />Block 1 Lot 1 - With the proposed configuration, I <br />doubt that 2 contiguous acres of dry buildable land <br />are included. The division line between lots 1 and <br />2 should be moved eastward to divide the high ground <br />into more equal-sized areas. <br />Block 1 Lot 2 - See above. Both lots 1 and 2 should <br />be required to have 2 contiguous acres of dry build <br />able. The .oil on these lots is Lerdal Loam (LMB) <br />with a percolation rate generally suitable for <br />standard or mound systems but with a high water table <br />generally requiring a mound or shallow trench system. <br />We should require soil testing on these two lots. <br />Block 2 Lot 1 - Soils on the lot include Lerdal Loam, <br />Erin Loam, and Glencoe silty clay loam, and a desig <br />nated wetland not previously included on any proposals. <br />At best we could expect a mound system to be possible <br />here. This lot does not contain two acres of what I <br />would consider good dry buildable land. <br />Block 2 Lot 2 - This land contains a l-acre+ wet <br />land which divides the lot into two separate parcels <br />high ground is mostly Erin soils which may support <br />a standard or mound system. <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.