Laserfiche WebLink
>9 V* m A* A V ^J» <br />17, /iff <br />• U’j'f^ <br />itor Hennepin Cty. DOT <br />Kinn. Stet* DOT <br />Minn. DNH <br />The set back <br />11 be at least <br />oser to the <br />the shoreline <br />nt and. nearby <br />/h^trlCGL <br />?! w <br />SUGGESTED FINDINGS 7/ <br />t ^ ■ ; i‘ ' Itr ((i^ <br />1. <br />5. <br />6. <br />The epeclal conditiont «pplyin9 to the etructure or lend in queeliun are pi«culiar to euch property or <br />irr^nediately eurroundinq property and do not apply qenerally to other land or atrocture. In the diatrici <br />in which aaid land is located; OP <br />TUm conditions sppiylnq to the structure or lend In question sre not pcculisr to such " . <br />inmediately surrounding property but do spply generally to other land or atructures n e ■ <br />Which aaid land ia located. <br />The qrsnting of the spplicstlon iX is_ _ _is not necesssry for the preservation and enjoyisent of • <br />aubstantial property right of the applicant. <br />The granting of the propoaed variance will not in any way Impair the public health, safety, comfort, <br />morals or general welfare: OR <br />The granting of the propoaed variance may impair the public health, safety, comfort, rrorals or <br />general welfare. <br />The granting of the proposed variance will not b« contrary to the intent of the Conptehensive band Os. <br />Plan or the Zoning Code; OR <br />Iha granting of the propoaed variance would be contrary to the Intent of the Comprehensive Land Oa. <br />Plan or the Zoning Code. <br />The granting of such variance will not n«rcly serve as a convenience to the applicant, but ia necessary <br />to alleviate demonstrated hardships or difficulties; OR <br />The applicant has d.r^n.trat.d no recognized hard.hlp or difficulty and therefor, the granting of auch <br />vsrianca would merely serve as a convenience to auch applicant. ^ ^ ^ <br />y <br />r/a Tta^ 1 ^^ I rt |< /—At<X <br />aJU <br />SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL