Laserfiche WebLink
1.1. J .• <br />i <br />/ <br />I <br />• •# <br />EXHIBIT 7 #5 <br />TO:Jeanne Mabuath, Zoning Administrator <br />FROM:Michael Gaffron, Septic System Inspector <br />DATE: August 6, 1979 <br />SUBJECT: Jerry Gustafson, 200 Bederwood Road <br />Septic System Reconstruction <br />In August, 1978, Mr. Gustafson called in and said he would like to <br />add on to his existing dralnfleld system as mainly a precautionary <br />measure. During my site inspection, I noted that the ground was <br />fairly low and at that time required that a qualified person do a <br />soil boring to determine soil types and depth to the water table. <br />The boring log subsequently indicated that due to high ^Sfonn'a <br />and generally clay soils a mound system was in order. Vk. Gustafson s <br />contractor submitted a design which was approved by myself and <br />verbally by the City engineer. Work was to commence in the Spring <br />of 1979 after proper license and permit were obtained. I did <br />verbally allow Mr. Gustafson to bring in sand fill for the system <br />in the Fall of 1978 before a permit was issued. <br />In Spring 1979, Mr. Gustafson brought in plans for a structural <br />addition to his basement, presumably for a pump pit and added <br />laundry area. As in all addition permit applications, a suwey <br />was required. The survey showed that the existing house and <br />proposed addition encroach upon the zoning setbacks. Mr. Gustafson <br />is applying for a variance to allow the structural addition. In <br />my opinion, successful completion of Mr. Gustafson's mo^d sewage <br />system does not depend upon the proposed addition becoming a reality. <br />The pump or pumps required in the system can be installed and Mde <br />operable without the addition. Therefore, I would suggest that the <br />addition ba reviewed based on Its own merits rather than as an <br />integral and necessary component of the septic system. <br />ITS <br />i»t> <br />rv,j <br />f <br />m <br />I <br />s